Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 23;57(11):e01269-19. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01269-19

TABLE 3.

Summary of performance, post-discrepancy resolution, for CBDE and CAT methods compared to reference MICsa

Test results CBDE CAT-1 CAT-10
All isolates, n = 627 tests
    CA (%) 97.9 97.0 98.3
    EA (%) 94.4 94.9 96.2
    No. of VME 9 (3.2%) 19 (6.8%) 11 (3.9%)
    No. of ME 3 (0.9%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Enterobacterales, n = 348 tests
    CA (%) 98.6 99.4 99.7
    EA (%) 94.3 98.3 99.7
    No. of VME 5 (2.5%) 2 (1.0%) 1 (0.5%)
    No. of ME 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
P. aeruginosa, n = 148 tests
    CA (%) 99.3 98.7 100
    EA (%) 96.6 99.3 99.3
    No. of VME 0 (0%) 1 (8.3%) 0 (0%)
    No. of ME 1 (0.7%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Acinetobacter spp., n = 131 tests
    CA (%) 95.4 88.5 92.3
    EA (%) 93.1 83.1 88.5
    No. of VME 4 (5.6%) 15 (21.4%) 10 (14.3%)
    No. of ME 2 (3.3%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
a

CAT-1 = 1 μl inoculum; CAT-10 = 10 μl inoculum.