Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 24;19:997. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6189-9

Table 2.

Subgroup analysis of pooled HR of OS by various factors with elevated 8-OHdG expression

Subgroup analysis No. of studies No. of patients Pooled HR (95%CI) Meta regression (p -value) Heterogeneity
I2 p -value
Race
 Caucasoid 12 1129 1.962 [1.341–2.870] 0.907 66.6% 0.001
 Mongoloid 5 467 1.862 [1.117–3.104] 80.2% < 0.001
Cancer types
 Hepatocellular carcinoma 2 156 2.853 [0.673–12.089] 0.727 84.2% 0.012
 Ovarian carcinoma 6 424 1.867 [1.190–2.930] 0.464 58.0% 0.036
 Colorectal cancer 4 330 1.637 [0.850–3.153] 0.352 71.5% 0.014
 Esophageal cancer 1 144 3.400 [2.055–5.624] 0.982
 Nonsmall-Cell Lung cancer 1 99 3.330 [1.588–6.982]
 Melanoma 1 46 1.470 [1.019–2.121] 0.367
 Breast cancer 1 145 0.100 [0.017–0.583] 0.019
 Bladder cancer 1 252 3.130 [1.298–7.548] 0.950
Detection method of 8-OHdG
 IHC 12 1157 1.787 [1.246–2.563] 0.646 74.1% < 0.001
 ELISA 4 360 2.386 [1.167–4.881] 0.947 71.0% 0.016
 LCEC 1 79 2.510 [1.018–6.187]
Sample classification
 Tissue 14 1412 1.792 [1.307–2.458] 73.6% < 0.001
 Plasma or urine 3 268 3.042 [1.676–5.519] 0.006 0.0% 0.856
Detection location of 8-OHdG
 Nuclei 10 1019 1.927 [1.321–2.810] 0.596 71.5% < 0.001
 Cytoplasm 1 138 0.759 [0.454–1.268] 0.118
 Not mentioned 6 439 2.345 [1.429–3.848] 57.6% 0.038
research quality
 NOS score ≥ 7 5 499 1.658 [1.002–2.743] 0.526 82.7% < 0.001
 NOS score < 7 12 1097 2.104 [1.456–3.040] 60.6% 0.003