Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 18;10:2077. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02077

Table 5.

Analytical review of primary works according to a GREOM adaptation (Portell et al., 2015).

Number References Domain A Domain B: method Domain C: results Comments
Observational method Observ. design Instrument Record parameter Quality of data Data analysis and results
Observation Recording
1 Almeida et al., 2014 Direct observation Not FF/CS [Field format combined with category systems] MATCH VISION STUDIO Freq Kappa Descriptive analysis
Multivariate logistic regression
Criteria are called variables.
They use independent and dependent variables.
2 Andrade et al., 2012 Direct observation Not CS [Category System] Video (from TV) Freq Kappa Descriptive analysis
Shapiro-Wilk test
Mean comparation
3 Ardá et al., 2014 Direct observation N/S/M FF/SC Video (from TV) Freq Kappa
Consensual agreement
Descriptive analysis
Chi-square
Logistic regression (SPSS)
Dimensions are called variables
4 Armatas and Yiannakos, 2010 Direct observation Not Scoreboard Video
SPORTSCOURT
Freq Kappa Descriptive analysis
Chi-square
5 Armatas et al., 2009 Direct observation Not Scoreboard Video
SPORTSCOURT
Freq Kappa
Correlation coefficient
Descriptive analysis
Chi-square
6 Barbosa et al., 2014 Direct observation I/S/M FF/CS SDIS-GSEQ Order Kappa
Consensual agreement
Lag sequential analysis
7 Barreira et al., 2014 Direct observation N/S/M FF/CS SoccerEye Order Kappa Lag sequential analysis
8 Barros et al., 2007 Direct observation Not Distances Automated tracking system Freq Not Descriptive analysis
Kruskal-Wallis test
ANOVA
9 Bradley et al., 2009 Direct observation Not Categories (Does not meet the category system requirements) Computerized tracking system (Stadium Manager, ProZone) Freq Variation coefficient Descriptive analysis
Normality test
ANOVA
Tukey's post-hoc tests
10 Braz and Marcelino, 2013 Indirect observation Not Zonas Video
Excel
Freq
Duration
Not Descriptive analysis
D'Agostino-Pearson test
ANOVA
Tukey test
Data downloaded from the web http://pt.fifa.com/index.html
11 Buraczewski et al., 2013 Direct observation Not CS Not Freq Not Descriptive analysis
Mean comparison
12 Buscá Safont-Tria et al., 1996 Indirect observation Not CB (Catalog of behaviors] Video Freq Agreement coefficient Descriptive analysis Data provided by Televisió de Catalunya
13 Camerino et al., 2012a Direct observation N/P/M FF/CS MATCH VISION STUDIO Order Kappa T-Patterns
14 Carey et al., 2001 Direct observation Not CB Video Freq Agreement percentage Descriptive analysis
Correlation
15 Carling, 2011 Direct observation Not Categories Computerized tracking AMISCO Freq Not Descriptive analysis
Normality test
ANOVA
Bonferroni test
Effect sizes
16 Casáis et al., 2011 Indirect observation Not CB Not Freq Kappa Descriptive analysis
Kruskal-Wallis test
Discriminant analysis
Data downloaded from the www.sdifutbol.com website
Dimensions/behaviors are named variables
Observation is called “notation system”
17 Casal et al., 2014 Direct observation N/F/M FF NAC SPORT ELITE 42 Freq Kappa Descriptive analysis
Chi-square
Logistic regression
18 Casal et al., 2016 Direct observation N/F/M FF/CS NAC SPORT ELITE 42 and LINCE Freq Kappa Descriptive analysis
Chi-square
Logistic regression
Dimensions are called variables
19 Casal et al., 2015a Direct observation N/S/M FF/CS Video Freq Kappa Descriptive analysis
Chi-square
Logistic regression
Dimensions are called variables
20 Casal et al., 2017 Direct observation Not FF/CS Video Freq
Duration
Kappa Kruskal-Wallis test
Welch test
Logistic regression
21 Casal et al., 2015b Direct observation N/S/M FF NAC SPORT ELITE 42 Freq Kappa Chi-square
Logistic regression
Dimensions are called variables
22 Castañer et al., 2016 Direct observation I/F/M FC/SC (OSMOS) LINCE Order Kappa Proportions comparison
Lag sequential analysos
Polar coordinates
23 Castañer et al., 2017 Direct observation N/F/M FC/SC (OSMOS) LINCE Order Kappa T-Patterns detection
Polar coordinates
24 Castelão et al., 2015 Direct observation Not CB Video (from TV)
Excel
SDIS-GSEQ
Order Not Descriptive analysis
Lag sequential analysis (SDIS-GSEQ)
25 Castellano and Hernández-Mendo, 2000 Direct observation Lag-log FC/SC Video
SDIS-GSEQ
Order Kappa Consensual agreement
Kendall
Pearson
Spearman
TG
Lag seqüencial analysis (SDIS-GSEQ)
26 Castellano and Hernández-Mendo, 2002a Direct observation Lag-log FC/SC (SOCCAF) Video Order Kappa
Correl.
TG
TG
Lag sequential analysis (SDIS-GSEQ)
27 Castellano and Álvarez, 2013 Direct observation Not CB
Distances
Video
EXCEL
Computerized tracking AMISCO
Freq Not Descriptive analysis
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
Levene test
Lineal regression
Correlations
Dimensions/behaviors are named variables They use independent and dependent variables
28 Castellano et al., 2013 Direct observation Not Distances AMISCO Pro Freq Kappa Descriptive analysis
Mean comparison
ANOVA
Bonferroni test
Effect size
Dimension “distance” is called “variable”
Semiautomatic registration System
29 Castellano et al., 2011 Direct observation Not Distances and CS Amisco Freq Not Descriptive analysis
Mauchly's test of sphericity
General linear model
Repeated measures ANOVA
30 Castellano et al., 2012 Indirect observation Not CS Freq Kappa Descriptive analysis
Dunnett post-hoc test
Discriminant analysis
Data downloaded from the web: http://fifa.com/worldcup/index.html
Behaviors are named indicators
Dimensions/criteria are named variables
31 Castellano et al., 2009 Direct observation Not CS Video EXCEL Freq Consensual agreement Multidimensional scaling
Correspondence analysis
32 Cavalera et al., 2015 Direct observation N/F/M FC/SC Video LINCE Order Kappa T-Patterns
33 Clemente, 2012 Indirect observation Not CB Not Freq Not Descriptive analysis
ANOVA
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
Levene test
Data downloaded from the web (http://www.fifa.com/worldcup/archive/southafrica2010/index.html)
Observation is called “notation analysis”
Behaviors are named variables, they also call them indicators
The terms independent and dependent variable are used
34 Collet, 2013 Indirect observation Not CS
Duration
Video
STATA
Freq
Duration
Not Odds ratio
Correlation
Logistic regression
Some data was downloaded from websites:
http://www.uefa.com/memberassociations/uefarankings/club/index.html
http://www.fifa.com/worldranking/rankingtable/index.html
35 Di Salvo et al., 2010 Direct observation Not CB Semi-automated image recognition system (Prozone®) Freq Not Descriptive analysis
Mean comparison
Size effect
36 Di Salvo et al., 2007 Direct observation Not Categories
Rating scale
Distances
Computerized tracking AMISCO Freq Not Descriptive analysis
ANOVA
Tukey test
37 Di Salvo et al., 2008 Direct observation Not Rating scale Video Freq Not Descriptive analysis
Pearson correlation
38 Di Salvo et al., 2009 Direct observation Not Distances and some behaviors Semi-automated image recognition system (Prozone ®) Freq Coefficient of variation Mixed linear modeling
Bonferroni test
39 Fleury et al., 2009 Indirect observation Not Indicators Excel Freq Not Descriptive analysis Data downloaded from the web http://www.cbf.com.br
40 Gómez-Ruano et al., 2012 Indirect observation Not CB Not Freq Kappa Mixed linear model
Factor analysis (using principal components and varimax rotation)
Data downloaded from the web www.sdifutbol.com
They use independent and dependent variables Observation is called “notation system”
41 Holienka and Farkasovsy, 2017 Direct observation Not CB Not Freq Not Binomial test
Mann-Whitney test
Authors consider it indirect observation
42 Hughes and Franks, 2005 Direct observation Not CB Scoreboard Video Freq Percentage agreement Mean comparison
Regression analysis
Observation is called “notation system”
43 James et al., 2002 Direct observation Not CB Scoreboard Video computerized System (Noldus Observer Video Pro) Freq Agreement percent Chi-square
44 Lago-Ballesteros and Lago-Peñas, 2010 Indirect observation Not CB Not Freq Kappa Descriptive analysis
ANOVA
Data downloaded from the web www.sdifutbol.com
Dimensions/behaviors are named variables
45 Lago-Peñas and Anguera, 2003 Direct observation Not FF Video Order Consensual agreement
Kappa
Lag sequential analysis
46 Lago-Peñas and Lago-Ballesteros, 2011 Indirect observation Not BC Not Freq Kappa Descriptive analysis
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
Mean comparison (t and Mann-Whitney)
Structural coefficients
Dimensions/behaviors are named variables
Observation is called “notation system”
47 Lago-Peñas et al., 2010 Indirect observation Not BC Not Freq Kappa Descriptive analysis
Kruskal-Wallis test
Chi-square
Discriminant analysis
Data downloaded from the web www.sdifutbol.com
Dimensions/behaviors are named variables
Observation is called “notation system”
48 Lago-Peñas and Martín, 2007 Indirect observation Not BC Not Freq and duration Not Determination coefficient
Regression analysis
They use independent and dependent variables
Observation is called “notation system”
49 Lago-Peñas and Dellal, 2010 Indirect observation Not BC Not Freq Kappa Descriptive analysis
Variation coefficient
Regression analysis
They use independent and dependent variables
Dimensions/behaviors are named variables
50 Lago-Peñas et al., 2003 Direct observation I/F/M FF Video
SDIS-GSEQ
Order Kappa
Consensual agreement
Descriptive analysis
Lag sequential analysis
51 Lago-Peñas et al., 2009 Direct observation Not Categories
Rating scales
Computerized tracking AMISCO Freq Kappa Descriptive analysis
Lineal regression
Dimensions/behaviors are named variables
They use independent and dependent variables
52 Lago-Peñas et al., 2010 Direct observation Not Categories Computerized tracking AMISCO Freq Not Descriptive analysis
Lineal regression
Dimensions/behaviors are named variables
53 Lago-Peñas et al., 2011 Indirect observation Not BC Not Freq Kappa Descriptive analysis
ANOVA
Discriminant analysis
Structural coefficients
Criteria are named variables
54 Leite, 2013 Indirect observation Not Scoreboard Archive data Freq Not Descriptive analysis Data downloaded from the web www.fifa.com
55 Losada, 2012 Direct observation N/F/M FC/SC MATCH VISION STUDIO Freq Kappa Descriptive analysis
ANOVA
Log-linear analysis
Correspondence analysis
56 Machado et al., 2013 Direct observation N/F/M FF/SC SoccerEye Order Kappa Lag sequential analysis
57 Maneiro et al., 2017a Direct observation N/S/M FC/SC Video Freq Kappa Descriptive analysis
Chi-square
Dimensions are named variables
58 Maneiro et al., 2017b Direct observation N/S/M FC/SC Video Freq Kappa Descriptive analysis
Chi-square
Logistic regression
59 Moraes et al., 2012 Indirect observation Not Categories Video Freq
Duration
Kappa Descriptive analysis
Chi-square
Data provided by Central Digital de Dados–GFPA
Dimensions are named variables
60 Njororai, 2013 Indirect observation Not Archive data Freq Kappa Descriptive analysis Data downloaded from the web http://www.fifa.com/worldcup/statistics
61 Novaes de Souza et al., 2012 Indirect observation Not Categories Video Freq Third observer when disagreement existed Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
Levene test
ANOVA
Newman-Keuls test
Friedman test
Data downloaded from the webs:
Esporte.uol.com.br/futebol/campeonatos/brasileiro/, globoesporte.globo.com, www.youtube.com
62 Pino et al., 1998 Direct observation Not SC
Rating scale
Video Freq Correlation coefficient Descriptive analysis
Chi-square
63 Planes and Anguera, 2015 Direct observation N/F/M FF/SC MOTS
LINCE
Order Kappa Comparison proportions
64 Pollard, 2006 Indirect observation Not Scoreboard Not Freq Not Descriptive analysis
Regression analysis
Data downloaded from the webs: www.soccerway.com, www.rsssf.com and the Rothmans Football Yearbook independent and dependent variables are used
65 Ramos and Oliveira, 2008 Direct observation Not BC Video Freq Not Descriptive analysis
66 Rampinini et al., 2007 Direct observation Not Categories Video
Semiautomatic system PROZONE
Freq
Duration
Not Descriptive analysis
Normality test
Sphericity test
ANOVA
Bonferroni post-ho test
67 Ric et al., 2016 Direct observation Not Categories SPI Pro
GPSports
Freq
Duration
Not Hierarchical principal components
Kruskal-Wallis test
68 Sainz de Baranda and López-Riquelme, 2012 Direct observation Not CS Video
DARTFISH TEAM PRO
Freq Kappa Descriptive analysis
Chi-square
Phi coefficient
Cramer statistic
Observation is also called “notation system”
69 Sáinz de Baranda et al., 2011 Direct observation Not CS Not Freq Kappa
Correlation coefficient
Descriptive analysis
Chi-square
70 Sánchez et al., 2009 Indirect observation Not Scoreboard archived data Freq Not Mean comparation
ANOVA
Data downloaded from the web www.lfp.es
71 Sánchez-Flores et al., 2012 Direct observation Not CS Video
OBSERVER
Freq Kappa
Consensual agreement
Descriptive analysis
Chi-square
Binomial test (Poisson)
The observation instrument consists of categories and subcategories. Interplay sequentially is implicit.
72 Santos et al., 2016 Direct observation Not CS Video
Excel
Freq Kappa Descriptive analysis
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
Kruskal-Wallis test
73 Sarmento et al., 2011 Direct observation Not FF Not Order Inter- and intra-agreement T-Patterns
74 Sarmento et al., 2017 Direct observation Not CS Video Freq Kappa Chi-square
Logistic regression
75 Scoulding et al., 2004 Direct observation Not CS Video
NOLDUS OBSERVER VIDEO PRO
Freq
Duration
Agreement Chi-square
Mann-Whitney test
Observation is called “notational system”
76 Sgrò et al., 2016 Direct observation Not Indicators Video
LONGOMATCH
Freq ICC coefficient OTP Ratio
ANOVA
Logistic regression
Behaviors are named indicators
77 Sgrò et al., 2015 Direct observation Not BC Video
LONGOMATCH
Freq Correlation coefficient Descriptive analysos
Shapiro-Wilk test
Kruskal-Wallis test
Discriminant analysis
Observation is called “notation system”
Behaviors are named indicators
The denomination of independent and dependent variables is used
78 Shafizadeh et al., 2013 Direct observation Not BC
Technical data
Video
SPORTS PERFORMER
SOFTWARE
Freq Not Time-series analysis Behaviors are named indicators
79 Siegle and Lames, 2012 Direct observation Not FF/CS Video Freq
Duration
Kappa
Correlation coefficient
Descriptive analysis
ANOVA
MANOVA
80 Silva et al., 2009 Indirect observation Not BC
Distances
archived data Freq Not Spearman
correlation
Behaviors to be observed are called ‘technical indicators’
Data downloaded from the web: www.globo.com/globoesporte
81 Silva et al., 2005 Direct observation N/F/M BC Video
SDIS-GSEQ
Order Kappa Lag sequential analysis
82 Soroka, 2014 Direct observation Not BC Video
Semiautomatic system FIFA's Castrol Performance
Freq Not Efficacy index
Efficiency index
Descriptive analysis
Mean comparison
83 Stanculescu et al., 2014 Direct observation Not Categories Video Freq Not Descriptive analysis
Means comparation
Observation is called “notation system”
Behaviors to be observed are called “parameters”
84 Szwarc, 2008 Direct observation Not BC Video Freq Not Descriptive analysis
85 Taylor et al., 2008 Direct observation Not Categories Video
NOLDUS OBSERVER VIDEO PRO
Freq Agreement coefficient Log-linear analysis
Logit analysis
Observation is called “notation system”
86 Tenga et al., 2010c Direct observation Not BC Not Freq Not Descriptive analysis
Logistic regression
Criteria/behaviors are named variables
Control sample was used
87 Tenga et al., 2010b Direct observation Not BC Video
FINAL CUT PRO
Freq Kappa Descriptive analysis
Logistic regression
ROC curve
Dimensions/behaviors are named variables
They use independent and dependent variables
88 Thomas et al., 2006 Indirect observation Not Rating scale Not Freq Not Descriptive analysis
Chi-square
Data downloaded from the web: www.soccerbase.com
89 Tierney et al., 2016) Direct observation Not BC Not Freq Not Descriptive analysis
MANOVA
It is combined with an experimental method
90 Vigne et al., 2010 Direct observation Not BC Video Freq Kappa Descriptive analysis
ANOVA
91 Vogelbein et al., 2014 Direct observation Not BC
Scoreboard
German PAL
MathBall software
Freq and duration Kappa
α de Cronbach
Descriptive statistics
Kruskal-Wallis test
Mann-Whitney test
Point-biserial correlation
92 Wallace and Norton, 2014 Direct observation Not FF/CS SportsTec Australia Freq
Duration
Inter e intra (binomial test) Regression analysis
Trend analysis
Also, it is a correlational study
Observation is called “notation system”
93 Yiannakos and Armatas, 2006 Direct observation Not BC
Distances
Video
SPORTSCOURT
Freq Correlation coefficient Descriptive analysis
Chi-square
94 Zurloni et al., 2014 Direct observation N/P/M BC LINCE Order Kappa T-Patterns