Table 2.
Estimated total editing frequency for TaABCC6, TansLTP9.4 and TaNFXL1
| Sample | Editing frequencya | Sample | Editing frequency | Sample | Editing frequency | Sample | Editing frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABCC6-1 | 9.3 | nsLTP9.4-1 | 9.1 | NFXL1-1 | 8.4 | pcoNFXL1-1b | 10.2 |
| ABCC6-2 | 6.6 | nsLTP9.4-2 | 1.9 | NFXL1-2 | 18.3 | pcoNFXL1-2 | 8.6 |
| ABCC6-3 | 9.1 | nsLTP9.4-3 | 11.3 | NFXL1-3 | 42.2 | pcoNFXL1-3 | 15.0 |
| ABCC6-4 | 13.0 | nsLTP9.4-4 | 11.9 | NFXL1-4 | 22.8 | pcoNFXL1-4 | 21.2 |
| ABCC6-5 | 9.0 | nsLTP9.4-5 | 0.0c | NFXL1-5 | 0.0c | pcoNFXL1-5 | 20.7 |
aEditing frequency (%) = (reads with modification/(mapped reads + reads with modification)) × 100
bpcoCas9 was used instead of crCas9 for the samples pcoNFXL1-1 to 5
cNo modification was detected in those samples