Table 4.

NIATx protocol adherence among organizations (n = 24)

NIATx Adherence ƚ	Full adherence to NIATx	Partial adherence to NIATx	No adherence to NIATx
NIATx Strategy n (%)	11 (45.8)	7 (29.2)	6 (25.0)
Proportion of Completed Activities A	85.1%	79.5%	41.4%
Duration of Activities (Days) B	295.7	211.1	128.3
Total Time (Days) C	290.6	229.0	124.8
Prior NIATx Experience n (%)	3 (27%)	1 (14%)	1 (17%)
Change Projects Implemented mean (sd)D	2.55 (0.93)	1.71 (1.25)	0.83 (0.41)
Number of Coaching Calls mean (sd)E	7.00 (2.32)	7.14 (2.97)	2.66 (2.16)
Meeting Attendance ((n = 4) n (%)	3.0 (75%)	2.6 (65%)	1.8 (45%)

^ƚNIATx adherence consists of three NIATx Stages of Implementation Completion components: 1) proportion of completed activities; 2) duration of activities; and 3) total time from first to last activity. Full adherence to NIATx was any agency with values ≥ the average across all three components; Partial adherence was any agency with values ≤ the average across any two of the three components; and No adherence was any agency with a value ≤ the average across all three components

^ASignificant difference between groups (F = 19.77, p < 0.001). Full adherence differs from no adherence (p = 0.003) and partial adherence differs from no adherence (p = 0.007)

^BSignificant difference between groups (F = 33.47, p < 0.001). Full adherence differs from partial and no adherence and partial adherence differs from no adherence. All p-values < 0.001

^CSignificant difference between groups (F = 25.43, p < 0.001). Full adherence differs from partial (p < 0.001) and no adherence (p = 0.012). No significant difference between partial and no adherence (p = 0.071)

^DSignificant difference between groups (F = 5.82, p = 0.007). Full adherence differs from no adherence (p = 0.005)

^ESignificant difference between groups (F = 6.99, p = 0.005). Full adherence differs from no adherence (p = 0.007) and partial adherence differs from no adherence (p = 0.011)