Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2018 Sep 28;184:658–668. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.072

Figure 6.

Figure 6

SAR calculated from the temperature data shown in Figure 5 is plotted with respect to induced RF current calculated from the B1+null locations in Figure 3. Matlab’s “fitlm” routine was used to fit the best line to the data resulting in an RMS error of 1.74 for contact 1 and 1.28 for contact 8. A linear pattern is observed between the two quantities. Note thatCh1+Ch2 and Ch1-Ch2 used twice as much transmitted power in comparison to other excitation patterns.