Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2018 Sep 28;184:658–668. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.072

Table 2.

Mean signal intensity and percent signal variation are calculated near DBS and elsewhere. IF excitation was able to increase the mean signal intensity and decrease the percent signal variation around the lead compared to the Quadrature excitation.

Mean Signal Intensity
(Near DBS)
Mean Signal Intensity
(Elsewhere)
Percent Signal
Variation
(Near DBS)
Percent Signal
Variation
(Elsewhere)
Implant Friendly 1180 564 %45 %27
Quadrature 592 587 %67 %16