Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 3.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Stem Cell. 2019 May 9;25(1):23–38.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2019.04.004

Figure 2. YAP Activity Defines BEC Heterogeneity In Vivo and Reflects a Dynamic Cell State In Vitro.

Figure 2.

(A) Cyr61-Klf6 and Cyr61-Hes1 RNA-ISH combined with IF stain for pan-Cytokeratin (pCK) of mouse liver sections. Arrows indicate BECs co-expressing Cyr61 and Klf6 RNA, and arrowheads RNA-negative molecules.

(B) Bubble plots depicting the correlation of co-localized Cyr61-Klf6 and Cyr61-Hes1RNA molecules per BEC. Size of bubble corresponds to the respective co-expression frequency with inset showing size of bubble corresponding to % of cells with indicated frequency (n = 4 mice, BECs from 5 portal fields each, Spearman correlation).

(C) IF for pERK and JUNB (arrows) demonstrate heterogeneity within murine Cytokeratin19+ (KRT19+) BECs.

(D) Schematic for the Cyr61eGFP transgenic allele which expresses eGFP under the Cyr61 promoter and is used as a reporter for YAP transcriptional activity.

(E) Representative FACS analysis of GFP expression in BECs of a wildtype (WT) and a Cyr61eGFP mouse, where typically between 3–11% GFP+ BECs are seen.

(F) IF for GFP/KRT19 demonstrating clear intraductal heterogeneity of expression in the liver of a Cyr61eGFP-reporter mice. Arrows designate GFP+ cells.

(G) FACs analysis of freshly isolated GFP BECs sorted from Cyr61eGFP mice, used for in vitro organoid growth assay. Bar plot depicts % of GFP+ cells over time, from 5000 initially seeded GFP cells, showing that >90% of cultured BECs start expressing GFP within 6 days. (Mean ± SD, n = 3 mice, each in triplicate, ANOVA, followed by Tukey multiple comparisons test).

Dashed lines generally outline biliary structures.

See also Figure S2.