Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Skeletal Radiol. 2019 Jun 6;48(12):1999–2007. doi: 10.1007/s00256-019-03241-w

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

2A. Extremity CBCT scanner in the configuration for imaging of lower extremities and the experimental setup for the phantom study. 2B, top row: uncompensated reconstructions of the phantom for a range of motion amplitudes. Typical features of motion artifact are present. 2B, bottom row: motion compensated reconstructions. Reduction in artifacts is apparent. 2C: the image sharpness metric VIG as a function of motion amplitude for reconstructions with and without compensation. 2D: Motion amplitude estimated by the compensation algorithm is compared to nominal amplitude prescribed in the experiment.