Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 25;15:368. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2130-3

Table 2.

Detection of C. burnetii DNA in tick (questing and fed) and animal samples and antibody detection in animal sera

Region Goriška Notranjsko-kraška Pomurska Podravska Obalno-kraška Gorenjska Total
Location Čiginj Volče Dolenja vas Mačkovci Maribor Senožeče Vremščica Žirovnica
The number of ticks pools positive for C. burnetii/ total number of ticks sampled from vegetation 1/65 (1.52%) 0/44 (0%) 0/149 (0%) 0/93 (0%) 0/1 (0%) 1/17 (5.10%) 1/80 (1.24%) 1/52 (1.90%) 4/501 (0.79%)
The number of ticks with positive for C. burnetii/ total number of ticks sampled from animals 3/29 (10.3%) 1/4 (25%) 0/6 (0%) 1/4 (25%) 5/43 (11.6%)
Adjacent farm animals sheep sheep sheep cattle cattle sheep sheep cattle
The number of animal blood samples with detected C. burnetii/ total number of animal blood samples 5/20 (25%) 1/20 (5%) 0/20 (0%) 2/21 (9.5%) 0/10 (0%) 2/20 (10%) 2/20 (10%) 2/19 (10.5%) 14/150 (9.3%)
The number of animal blood samples with detected antibodies against C. burnetii/ total number of animal blood samples 4/20 (20%) 4/20 (20%) 12/20 (60%) 18/21 (85.7%) 5/10 (50%) 5/20 (25%) 12/20 (60%) 1/19 (5.2%) 61/150 (40.4%)
The number of ticks positive for C. burnetii/ total number of ticks sampled from deer 0/24 (0%) 2/10 (20%) 0/33 (0%) 2/33 (6%) 4/35 (11.4%) 0/22 (0%) 8/157 (5.09%)