Table 1.
Turtle ID | Faecal samples | Cloacal swabs | |
---|---|---|---|
Parasites | EPG/OPGa | Bacteriab | |
WEST 01 | Trematodes | Citrobacter spp. | |
Angiodyctium spp. | 8 | ||
Coccidia | |||
Eimeria carettae | 48 | ||
WEST 02 | Negative | – | Negative |
WEST 03 | Negative | – | Proteus spp. |
WEST 04 | Negative | – | Citrobacter spp.; Morganella morganii |
WEST 05 | Negative | – | Citrobacter spp.; Morganella morganii |
WEST 06 | Negative | – | Citrobacter spp.; Morganella morganii |
WEST 07 | Negative | – | Citrobacter spp.; Morganella morganii; Proteus spp. |
WEST 08 | Negative | – | Enterobacter spp.; Escherichia coli |
WEST 09 | Trematodes | Citrobacter spp.; Proteus spp. | |
Cymatocarpus spp. | 35 | ||
WEST 10 | Negative | – | Negative |
WEST 11 | Negative | – | Citrobacter spp.; Morganella morganii |
WEST 12 | Negative | – | Citrobacter spp.; Morganella morganii |
WEST 13 | Coccidia | Citrobacter spp.; Enterobacter spp. | |
Eimeria carettae | 50 | ||
WEST 14 | Negative | – | Negative |
WEST 15 | Trematodes | Citrobacter spp.; Escherichia coli | |
Enodiotrema spp. | 64 | ||
WEST 16 | Negative | – | Citrobacter spp.; Enterobacter spp.; Morganella morganii; Proteus spp.; Providencia rettgeri |
WEST 17 | Coccidia | c | |
Eimeria carettae | 70 | ||
WEST 18 | Trematodes | c | |
Angiodyctium spp. | 48 | ||
WEST 19 | Negative | – | c |
WEST 20 | Trematodes | c | |
Enodiotrema spp. | 14 | ||
EAST 01 | Negative | – | Negative |
EAST 02 | Trematodes | Hafnia alvei; Morganella morganii; Providencia rettgeri | |
Rhytidodes spp. | 140 | ||
EAST 03 | Negative | – | Citrobacter spp. |
EAST 04 | Negative | – | Negative |
EAST 05 | Trematodes | Citrobacter spp. | |
Rhytidodes spp. | 24 | ||
EAST 06 | Negative | – | Citrobacter spp.; Morganella morganii |
EAST 07 | Trematodes | Morganella morganii | |
Pachypsolus spp. | 180 | ||
EAST 08 | Trematodes | c | |
Enodiotrema spp. | 80 | ||
Rhytidodes spp. | 112 | ||
EAST 09 | Negative | – | c |
EAST 10 | Negative | – | c |
a EPG/OPG, eggs/oocysts per gram of faeces
b Bacterial species were confirmed when the API identification matched at least ‘very good ID’ (%id> 99.0 and T > 0.5)
c Sample excluded from analysis due to suspected contamination