Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 7;116(43):21769–21779. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1910613116

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Frameshifting at the dnaX and prfB motifs. (A) Schematics of the dnaX and prfB programmed frameshift motifs that were cloned into the reporter system. The upstream SD-like stimulators are shown in blue, with their deactivated versions below. The 0-frame amino acids are shown above and the frameshifted amino acids are shown below each sequence. Stop codons are red octagons. The dnaX motif also contains a downstream stem loop stimulator that was not altered. Note that, for the dnaX motif, −1 frameshifting produced the smaller translation product. (B) Frameshifting at the dnaX motif as a function of ribosome load. The construct with a strong SD sequence (AGGAGG) exhibited more frameshifting than a version with a weak SD sequence (AGATGG). Inactivation of the nearby SD-like stimulator reduced frameshifting and increased the influence of ribosome load. (Left) To even the abundances for presentation clarity, the anti-His6 Western had the strong samples diluted 35- and 25-fold for the with stimulator and without stimulator samples, respectively. (Right) Separate Westerns of 3 biological replicates were used to generate the data for the bar chart. (C) Frameshifting at the prfB motif. The construct with a strong SD sequence (AGGAGG) exhibited less frameshifting than the version with a weak SD sequence (AGAAGG); (Left) the strong versions were diluted 10-fold for the presented Western. Inactivation of the nearby SD-like stimulator reduced frameshifting and increased the influence of ribosome load. (Right) Separate Western blots of 3 biological replicates were used to generate the data for the bar chart. Error bars represent 1 SD. Asterisks indicate t test P values of <0.01 (**), <0.001 (***), and <0.0001 (****).