Table 1.
Overview of studies reporting QoL in patients with KOA
References | Country | Study design | QoL instrument | Total Sample Size | Control Population | KOA Patients | Mean age | Gender Distribution |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cuzdan, 2017 [11] | Turkey | Cross-Sectional | SF-36 | 85 | 25 | 60 | 65.79 | Knee OA: 57 female; 3 male |
Control: 13 female; 12 male | ||||||||
Elbaz, 2017 [12] | Israel | Prospective observational | SF-36 | 93 | 30 | 63 | 64.2 | Knee OA: 41 female; 22 male |
Control: 9 female; 21 male | ||||||||
Lee, 2017 [13] | USA | Cross-Sectional | SF-36 | 120 | 40 | 80 | 60.3 | Knee OA: 61 female; 19 male |
Control: NA | ||||||||
Rundell, 2017 [14] | USA | Prospective | EQ-5D | 5155 | 4711 | 368 | 75.3 | Knee OA: 272 female; 96 male |
Control 3017 female; 1694 male | ||||||||
Wright, 2017 [15] | Australia | Cross-Sectional | SF-36 | 120 | 40 | 80 | 64 | Knee OA: 44 female; 36 male |
Araujo, 2016 [16] | Brazil | Cross-Sectional | SF-12 | 93 | 93 | 60 |
Knee OA: 69 female; 24 male Control: 24 female; 16 male |
|
Bokaeian, 2016 [17] | Iran | Randomized clinical trial | WOMAC | 28 | 28 | 52.9 | Knee OA: 25 female; 2 male | |
Cho, 2016 [18] | Republic of Korea | Prospective cohort study | SF-36 | 681 | 71.9 | Knee OA: 383 female; 298 male | ||
Kaban, 2016 [19] | Turkey | Cross-Sectional | SF-36 | 63 | 21 | 42 | 56.86 | All female |
Gomes-Neto, 2016 [20] | Brazil | Cross-Sectional | SF-36 | 35 | 35 | 66.57 | Knee OA: 29 female; 6 male | |
Khatib, 2016 [21] | Australia | Cross-Sectional | Tot. EQ (adjusted from EQ-5D-5L) | 2809 | 2809 | 68 | Knee OA: 1740 female; 1069 male | |
Kiadaliri, 2016 [22] | Sweden | Population based cohort study | EQ-5D | 1501 | 744 | 402 | 71.5 | Group 1 (reference group having neither knee pain nor radiographic or clinically-defined knee OA) 469 female; 275 male |
Group 2 (knee pain with-out OA) 119 female; 50 male | ||||||||
Group 3 (kne epain with OA) 256 female; 146 male | ||||||||
Kiadaliri, 2016 [23]a | Sweden | Retrospective | EQ-5D | First stage 7402; Second stage 1527 | The number of people diagnosis with knee OA is not specified | 69.4 | First stage 4604 female; 2798 male | |
Second stage 977 female; 550 male | ||||||||
Oishi, 2016 [24] | Japan | Cross-Sectional | KOOS | 963 | 397 | 54.33 | Total: 595 female; 368 male | |
Knee OA: 299 female; 98 male | ||||||||
Sarumathy, 2016 [25] | India | Prospective study | SF-36 | 74 | 74 | 51.7 | Knee OA: 55 female; 19 male | |
Cavalcante, 2015 [26] | Brazil | Cross-Sectional | WHOQOL | 90 | 40 | 50 | 67 | All female |
Fang, 2015 [27] | Taiwan |
Population based study |
SF-12 | 901 | 441 | 460 | 74.04 | Total: 492 female; 409 male |
Knee OA: 232 female; 209 male | ||||||||
Ferreira, 2015 [28] | Brazil | Cross-Sectional | SF-36 | 75 | 35 | 40 | 68.36 | All female |
Kawano, 2015 [29] | Brazil | Cross-Sectional | SF-36 | 93 | 93 | 61.2 | Knee OA: 69 females; 24 male | |
Kim, 2015 [30] | Korea | Cross-Sectional | EQ-5D | 2165 | 2165 | 67.73 | Knee OA: 1458 female; 707 male | |
Lee, 2015 [31] | South Korea | Cross-Sectional | EQ-5D | 7977 | 7977 | 61.5 | Knee OA: 5448 female; 4064 male | |
Pang, 2015 [32] | China | Cross-Sectional | SF-36 | 466 | 466 | 56.56 | Knee OA: 382 female; 84 male | |
Rakel, 2015 [33] | USA | Cross-Sectional | SF-36 | 100 | 25 | 75 | 56 | Knee OA: 46 female; 29 male |
Control: 15 female; 10 male | ||||||||
Reid, 2015 [34] | USA | Randomized controlled trial | SF-36 | 190 | 190 | 60.2 | Knee OA: 132 female; 58 male | |
Tsonga, 2015 [35] | Greece | Longitudinal | SF-36 | 68 | 68 | 73 | Knee OA: 57 female; 11 male | |
Visser, 2015 [36] | Netherlands | Cross-Sectional | SF-36 | 1262 | 1060 | 205 | 56 | Total: 707 female; 578 male |
Knee OA: 125 female; 80 male | ||||||||
Control: 583 female; 477 male | ||||||||
Alburquerque-garcía, 2015 [37] | Spain | Cross-Sectional | SF-36 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 85 | All female |
Alkan, 2014 [38] | Turkey | Cross-Sectional | SF-36 | 152 | 40 | 112 | 60 | Knee OA: 85 female; 27 male |
Control: 30 female 10 male | ||||||||
Forkel, 2014 [39] | Germany | Cross-Sectional | KOOS | 22 | 22 | 47 | Knee OA: 17 female; 6 male | |
Jahnke, 2014 [40] | Germany | Cross-Sectional | HAS | 159 | 159 | 63.5 | Knee OA: 75 female; 84 male | |
Marks, 2014 [41] | USA | Cross-Sectional | AIMS | 21 | 21 | 70.8 | All female | |
Pérez-Prieto, 2014 [42] | Spain | Prospective cohort study | SF-36 | 716 | 716 | 72 | Knee OA: 421 female; 295 male | |
Reis, 2014 [43] | Brazil | Cross-Sectional | WHOQOL | 12 | 12 | 67.25 | All female | |
Alentorn, 2013 [44] | Spain | Cross-Sectional | SF-36 | 391 | 391 | 70.7 | Knee OA: 303 female; 89 male | |
Clement, 2013 [45] | UK | Cross-Sectional | SF-12 | 996 | 996 | 70.32 | Knee OA: 545 female; 421 male | |
Vulcano, 2013 [46] | USA | Prospective cohort study | SF-36 | 4732 | 4732 | 66.88 | Knee OA: 2881 female; 1851 male | |
Williams, 2013 [47] | UK | Cross-Sectional | EQ-5D | 2456 | 2456 | 71.4 | Knee OA: 1494 female; 962 male | |
Coleman, 2012 [48] | Australia | Cross-Sectional | SF-36 | 146 | 146 | 65 | Knee OA: 109 female; 37 male | |
Gonçalves, 2012 [49] | Portugal | Cross-Sectional | SF-36 | 136 | 136 | 67.2 | Knee OA: 94 female; 42 male | |
Lim, 2012 [50] | Philippine | Cross-Sectional | WOMAC | 90 | 70.14 | Knee OA: 68 female; 22 male | ||
Elbaz, 2011 [51] | Israel | Cross-Sectional | SF-36 | 1487 | 1487 | 61.9 | Knee OA: 950 female; 537 male | |
Gonçalves, 2011 [52] | Portugal | Cross-Sectional | KOOS | 377 | 377 | 67.8 | Knee OA: 282 females; 95 males | |
Norimatsu, 2011 [53] | Japan | Prospective population-based cohort study | Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure (JKOM) | 333 | 333 | 64.2 | All female | |
Ozcakir, 2011 [54] | Turkey | Cross-Sectional | NHP | 100 | 100 | 59.5 | Knee OA: 83 female; 17 male | |
Paker, 2011 [55] | Turkey | Cross-Sectional | SF-36 | 75 | 75 | 66.1 | All female | |
Foroughi, 2010 [56] | Australia | Cross-Sectional | SF-36 | 17 | 17 | 66 | All female | |
Jenkins, 2010 [57] | USA | Cross-Sectional | QLI-A | 75 | 75 | 69 | Knee OA: 57 female; 18 male | |
Kim, 2010 [58] | Korea | Prospective cohort study | WOMAC | 504 | 504 | 70.2 | Knee OA: 274 female; 230 male | |
Muraki, 2010 [59] | Japan | Cross-Sectional | SF-8 | 2126 | 2126 | 68.9 | Knee OA: 1359 female; 767 male | |
Watanabe, 2010 [60] | Japan | Cross-Sectional | Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure (JKOM) | 18 | 18 | 67 | All female | |
Yildiz, 2010 [61] | Turkey | Cross-Sectional | NHP | 140 | 140 | 59.39 | Knee OA: 104 females; 36 males | |
Debi, 2009 [62] | Israel | Cross-Sectional | SF-36 | 134 | 66.95 | Knee OA: 85 females; 49 males | ||
Imamura, 2008 [63] | Brazil | Cross-Sectional | SF-36 | 84 | 22 | 62 | 71.1 | All female |
Control 68.95 | ||||||||
Liikavainio, 2008 [64] | Finland | Cross-Sectional | RAND-36 | 107 | 53 | 54 | 59 | All male |
Control 59.24 | ||||||||
Wang, 2008 [65] | Germany | Cross-Sectional | SF-36 | 1009 | 1009 | 48.5 | Knee OA: 620 female; 389 male | |
Nunez, 2007 [66] | Spain | Cross-Sectional | SF-36 | 100 | 100 | 71.2 | Knee OA: 71 female; 29 male | |
Salaffi, 2005 [67] | Italy | Cross-Sectional | SF-36 | 264 | KneeOA 108 | 65.7 | Knee OA: 64 female; 44 male | |
Knee OA + Hip OA 51 | Knee OA + Hip OA: 32 female; 19 male | |||||||
Chacón, 2004 [68] | Venezuela | Cross-Sectional | AIMS | 126 | 126 | 64 | Knee OA: 106 female; 20 male | |
Lam, 2000 [69] | China | Cross-Sectional case–control study | COOP/WONCA | 760 | 760 | 57.6 | Knee OA: 538 female; 222 male | |
de Leeuw, 1998 [70] | UK | Prospective trial | Rosser Index Matrix | 101 | 101 | 71.5 | Knee OA: 62 female; 39 male | |
Donnell, 1998 [71] | France | Cross-Sectional | Rosser Index Matrix | 221 | 221 | No specified | Knee OA: 174 female; 47 male | |
Ries, 1995 [72] | USA | Cross-Sectional | AIMS | 47 | 47 | 69.2 | Knee OA: 44 female; 3 male |
SF-36/SF-12/SF-8 (n=34); EQ-5D (n=6); KOOS (n=3); AIMS(n=3); WOMAC(n=3); Rossser Index matrix (n=2); NHP (n=2);JKOM(n=2); WHOQOL(n=2);COOP/WONCA (n=1); HAS(n=1); RAND-36(n=1)
aNot possible to add this article in gender calculation