Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eat Weight Disord. 2018 Jul 17;24(5):947–951. doi: 10.1007/s40519-018-0544-8

Table 1.

Comparison of demographic characteristics and SATAQ-4 subscales across and within countries

Variable United States (n = 1913) Italy (n = 159) England (n = 110) Australia (n = 93) F p Partial, η2 Cross-country pairwise comparisons
Cross-country ANOVA results
 Age 19.59 (1.99) 23.39 (2.47) 21.81 (2.73) 22.68 (3.19) F(3, 2246) = 229.59 < 0.001 0.24 I, A > E > US
 BMI 22.95 (4.48) 20.85 (3.02) 22.28 (3.90) 23.01 (3.87) F(3, 2250) = 11.79 < 0.001 0.02 A, US, E > I
Cross-country ANCOVA results
 Internalization: thin/low body fat 3.42 (0.91) 2.69 (1.07) 2.92 (1.03) 3.24 (1.10) F(3, 2224) = 25.54 < 0.001 0.03 US > E, I; A > I
 Internalization: muscular/athletic 2.70 (0.96) 2.22 (0.81) 2.42 (0.85) 2.49 (0.94) F(3, 2225) = 12.72 < 0.001 0.02 US > E, I
 Pressures: family 2.50 (1.16) 2.02 (1.01) 2.04 (0.96) 2.10 (1.03) F(3, 2213) = 4.65 0.003 0.01 US > EB
 Pressures: peer 2.89 (1.13) 1.75 (0.89) 1.97 (0.88) 2.08 (1.03) F(3, 2223) = 88.48 < 0.001 0.11 US > A, E, I
 Pressures: media 3.75 (1.16) 3.22 (1.36) 3.44 (1.07) 3.73 (1.03) F(3, 2221) = 5.35 0.001 0.01 US > I
 Within-country comparisons TI > MI MP > PP > FP TI > MI MP > PP > FP TI > MI MP > FP, PP TI > MI MP > FP, PP

All pairwise comparisons listed were significant at least at p < .05. Inferential statistics included age and BMI as covariates, but descriptive statistics (means and standard deviations) are reported as unadjusted for the covariates, so that they may be compared to other studies

US United States, I Italy, E England, A Australia, TI thin-ideal internalization, MI muscular-ideal internalization, MP media pressures, PP peer pressures, FP family pressures