Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 13;2019:2130935. doi: 10.1155/2019/2130935

Table 2.

The summary of outcomes and GRADE quality assessments.

Quality assessment No of patients Effect Quality Importance
No. of studies Design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other consideration HFNC COT Relative RR (95% CI) Absolute (95% CI)
Intubation rate
4 RCTs Seriousa Not serious Not serious Seriousb None 10/296 (3.4%) 17/275 (6.2%) 0.53(0.26–1.09) −32 per 1000 (from −69 to 4) ⊕⊕Low Critical

Mortality rate
2 RCTs Not serious Not serious Not serious Seriousb None 36/228 (15.8%) 24/203 (11.8%) 1.25(0.79–1.99) 32 per 1000 (from −32 to 95) ⊕⊕⊕Moderate Critical

ICU admission rate
2 RCTs Not serious Not serious Not serious Seriousb None 17/213 (8%) 15/190 (7.9%) 1.11(0.58–2.12) 8 per 1000 (from −43 to 59) ⊕⊕⊕Moderate Critical

ED discharge rate
2 RCTs Not serious Not serious Not serious Seriousb None 23/111 (20.7%) 23/117 (19.7%) 1.04(0.63–1.72) 8 per 1000 (from −93 to 109) ⊕⊕⊕Moderate Critical

Need for escalation
4 RCTs Seriousa Not serious Not serious Not serious None 13/296 (4.4%) 29/275 (10.5%) 0.41(0.22–0.78) −62 per 1000 (from −105 to −19) ⊕⊕⊕Moderate Critical

Length of ED stay (hour)
3 RCTs Not serious Seriousc Not serious Seriousb None 276 255 MD 1.66 hours (from −0.95 to 4.27) ⊕⊕Low Critical

Length of hospital stay (day)
2 RCTs Not serious Seriousc Not serious Seriousb None 228 203 MD 0.9 days (from −2.06 to 3.87) ⊕⊕Low Critical

Patient dyspnea score
2 RCTs Seriousd Seriousc Not serious Not serious None 83 85 MD −0.82 point (from −1.45 to −0.18) ⊕⊕Low Critical

Patient comfort score
3 RCTs Seriousd Not serious Not serious Not serious None 131 137 SMD −0.76 SD (from −1.01 to −0.51) ⊕⊕⊕Moderate Critical

RCT, randomized controlled trial; HFNC, high-flow nasal cannula; COT, conventional oxygen therapy; CI, confidence interval; RR, risk ratio; MD, mean difference; SMD, standardized mean difference. aAll inclusion trials lacked blinding (performance bias), so escalation or intubation may be subjective. bInsufficient evidence of clear benefit or harm because of a wide CI. cSignificant heterogeneity among the included trials (I2 > 50%). dSubjective outcome. ⊕, very low quality; ⊕⊕, low quality; ⊕⊕⊕, moderate quality; ⊕⊕⊕⊕, high quality.