Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 13;2019:6241743. doi: 10.1155/2019/6241743

Table 4.

Comparison of HE4, CA125, ROMA, and CPH-I among BOT I+II and EOC I+II group stratification by pathology.

BOT I+II EOC I+II
Serous Mucinous Endometrioid Clear cell Serous Mucinous Endometrioid Clear cell
HE4 (pmol/L) 49.8 (42.5-57.9) 45.3 (38.9-53.0) 57.4 (47.4-89.9) 37.8 (31.5-42.7) 130.6 (72.6-230.5) 57.3 (47.3-65.1) 91.9 (55.6-221.0) 64.8 (50.6-82.3)
CA125 (U/mL) 39.4 (19.6-86.5) 25.5 (17.9-37.2) 54.2 (24.8-127.3) 29.6 (22.7-53.5) 105.8 (55.5-392.9) 54.7 (16.0-117.8) 103.5 (32.1-251.8) 95.1 (34.5-180.3)
ROMA (%) 8.2 (5.5-12.5) 6.1 (4.2-9.6) 11.0 (7.0-43.8) 8.59 (3.0-18.4) 59.7 (23.5-81.9) 11.2 (7.1-14.0)# 45.1 (10.6-82.0) 21.2 (9.4-32.0)
CPH-I (%) 1.8 (1.2-4.6) 1.0 (0.6-2.0) 1.9 (1.4-11.4) 1.5 (0.9-2.3) 30.4 (7.8-56.1) 3.0 (1.7-7.9) 11.4 (2.5-57.0) 7.3 (3.1-14.6)

Note: data are presented as the median (interquartile range). P < 0.01 and #P < 0.05 EOC I+II vs. BOT I+II in corresponding subgroups. Abbreviations: BOT I+II = borderline ovarian tumors in FIGO stages I and II; EOC I+II = epithelial ovarian cancer in FIGO stages I and II.