Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 15;11(10):909–924. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i10.909

Table 3.

Study quality and bias in the retrospective cohort studies assessed via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale checklist

Study Cohort selection
Comparability
Outcome ascertainment
Representativeness of the exposed cohort Selection of the non-exposed cohort Ascertain-ment of exposure Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study Comparability of cases and controls on the basis of the design or analysis Assessment of outcome Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur Adequacy of follow up of cohorts
Cai et al[10], 2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0
Zhong et al[30], 2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0
Li et al[18], 2018 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 0
Weng et al[22], 2018 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 0
Chen et al[11], 2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Gong et al[14], 2018 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 0
Yu et al[26], 2018 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 0
Huang et al[17], 2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Han et al[16], 2017 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 0
Guo et al[15], 2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0
Zhang et al[27], 2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0