Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 15;11(10):909–924. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i10.909

Table 5.

Subgroup analysis conducted based on sample type, control type, and expression status among the diagnostic studies

Analysis Included individual studies Sensitivity 95%CI Specificity 95%CI PLR 95%CI NLR 95%CI DOR 95%CI AUC Heterogeneity
Sample type
Tissue 10 0.73 (0.70–0.77) 0.82 (0.78–0.84) 4.03 (2.98–5.46) 0.29 (0.19–0.43) 15.17 (8.42–27.34) 0.88 I2 = 73.9%, P = 0.0001
Plasma 3 0.79 (0.74–0.84) 0.65 (0.57–0.73) 2.33 (1.47–3.7) 0.28 (0.12–0.63) 8.93 (2.37–33.64) 0.72 I2 = 87.3%, P = 0.0004
Expression status
Up-regulated circRNAs 4 0.70 (0.62–0.78) 0.83 (0.76–0.89) 4.00 (2.71–5.91) 0.37 (0.28–0.50) 11.48 (5.90–22.33) 0.97 I2 = 21.2%, P = 0.2832
Down-regulated circRNAs 7 0.74 (0.70–0.77) 0.75 (0.71–0.78) 2.75 (2.16–3.5) 0.33 (0.22–0.49) 8.75 (5.31–14.43) 0.81 I2 = 70.4%, P = 0.0025
Control type
Chronic hepatitis/cirrhosis vs HCC 3 0.77 (0.72–0.81) 0.76 (0.71–0.81) 3.08 (2.49–3.80) 0.32 (0.25–0.41) 10.89 (7.51–15.78) 0.84 I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.5262
Adjacent non-cancerous liver tissue vs HCC 6 0.63 (0.57–0.68) 0.75 (0.69–0.81) 2.33 (1.44–3.75) 0.52 (0.40–0.69) 4.7 (3.12–7.08) 0.73 I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.4953

AUC: Area under the curve, PLR: Positive likelihood ratio; NLR: Negative likelihood ratio; DOR: Diagnostic odds ratio; HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma.