Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 28;2019(10):CD008521. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008521.pub5

RV1 Bernstein 1998‐USA.

Methods RCT
Length of follow‐up: outcomes measured up to 1 month after the second dose
Adverse event data collection methods: participants or their parents filled out a diary card for 7 days after each dose (passive method)
Participants Number: 42 enrolled; 42 evaluable
Inclusion criteria: all infants aged 6 to 26 weeks recruited from private practice offices in Cincinnati
Exclusion criteria: not stated
Interventions RV1
1. RIX4414 (RV1): 105 PFU; 21 participants
2. Placebo: 20 participants
Schedule: 2 doses given 6 to 10 weeks apart
Outcomes Clinical outcome measures
1. Reactogenicity: diarrhoea defined as > 3 stools that were looser than normal in a 24‐hour period; fever defined as a temperature > 100.4 °F obtained rectally in infants
2. Serious adverse events
3. Adverse events resulting in discontinuation
Outcomes to measure immunogenicity
4. Vaccine virus shedding: rotavirus shedding after immunization; combined time points (review includes data from combined time points)
5. Seroconversion: ≥ 4‐fold rise in rotavirus IgA antibody (serum and stool) (review includes data from after dose 1 and dose 2)
Immunization status Rotavirus vaccine was separated from all other infant vaccines by at least 2 weeks
Location Cincinnati, USA
WHO mortality stratum A
Notes Date: August to November 1995
Source of funding: Virus Research Institute, Inc. (now Avant Immunotherapeutics Inc.)
1 participant in the placebo group did not complete the study because of persistent otitis media
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Other bias Unclear risk Trial report does not provide enough details