Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 28;19:319. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2292-3

Table 2.

Univariate multinomial logistic regression analyses of the association between self-harm status and pre-motivational/motivational phase factors (adjusted for age, gender, depressive symptoms)

Self-harm status OR CI P
Pre-motivational/Motivational factors
Perceived stress
  No self-harm enaction or ideation Self-harm ideation 1.10 1.04–1.17 0.002
  No self-harm enaction or ideation Self-harm enaction 1.12 1.06–1.19 < 0.001
  Self-harm ideation Self-harm enaction 1.02 0.95–1.09 0.584
Support
  No self-harm enaction or ideation Self-harm ideation 0.90 0.82–0.98 0.019
  No self-harm enaction or ideation Self-harm enaction 0.84 0.77–0.92 < 0.001
  Self-harm ideation Self-harm enaction 0.94 0.85–1.04 0.208
NMR expectancies
  No self-harm enaction or ideation Self-harm ideation 0.97 0.96–0.98 < 0.001
  No self-harm enaction or ideation Self-harm enaction 0.97 0.96–0.98 < 0.001
  Self-harm ideation Self-harm enaction 1.00 0.99–1.01 0.441
Optimism
  No self-harm enaction or ideation Self-harm ideation 0.83 0.69–1.00 0.053
  No self-harm enaction or ideation Self-harm enaction 0.75 0.62–0.90 0.002
  Self-harm ideation Self-harm enaction 0.90 0.73–1.10 0.299

OR Odds ratio, CI 95% Confidence intervals

All statistically significant comparisons remain statistically significant after applying Holm’s sequential Bonferroni correction

NMR expectancies: Generalised Expectancies for Negative Mood Regulation scale