Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 17;16(9):727–731. doi: 10.1080/14789450.2019.1654863

Table 1.

Summary of gestational age modeling approaches.

Group Ontario, Canada Iowa, USA California, USA
Newborn Screening Program Newborn Screening Ontario Iowa Newborn Screening Program California Newborn Screening program
Sample size used for model development and testing 249,700 230,013 729,503
Years captured 2009–2011 2004–2009 2005–2011
Standard used for gestational age comparison LMP, fetal ultrasound or combination LMP or fetal ultrasound Fetal ultrasound, 11–20 weeks’ gestation
Number of metabolite terms used in final model 44 37 35
Clinical factors included in final model Birth weight, sex Final model included metabolite terms only. Performance of final model evaluated with each addition of: month/year of collection, age (hour) at collection, birth weight, sex Birth weight,
age (hour) at collection
Infants correctly classified within 1 week of true gestational age 66.8% 78% 78.3%*
Infants correctly classified within 2 weeks of true gestational age (%) 94.9% 95% 91.7%*

*model performance amongst preterm infants only, <37 weeks’ gestation where 99.5% of the infants were correctly classified as ‘term’ or ‘preterm’. LMP: Last Menstrual Period