Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 1;7(1):1–14. doi: 10.15171/ijoem.2016.607
Table 2: Methodological quality criteria and quality score
Citation Year Clearly focused question? Inclusion/exclusion Comprehensive Number of search
strategies
Number of years Methodological quality Methods weighting Strength of evidence Congruence data & author interpretation COI Quality Score Percent
Aas 2011 0 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 12 92%
Carroll 2010 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 12 92%
Corbiere 2006 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 13 100%
Corbiere 2009 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 1 1 12 92%
Czabala 2011 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 13 100%
Dick 2011 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 12 92%
Furlan 2012 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 12 92%
Noordick 2010 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 12 92%
Palmer 2012 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 12 92%
Pomaki 2012 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 1 1 12 92%
Richardson 2008 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 12 92%
Tompa 2008 1 1 0 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 11 85%
Tveito 2004 1 1 0 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 12 92%
van der Klink 2001 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 11 85%