Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 16;31(1):e22010. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22010

Table 2.

Distribution of Characteristics in Participants With and Without Hypercholesterolemia Treatment, Diabetes Mellitus, and Metabolic Syndrome

Characteristic HA (μg/l) P‐value hs‐CRP (mg/dl) P‐value Framingham risk score (Low/Intermediate) P‐value
Dyslipidemia
Yes (n = 142) 68.8 (3.2) 0.05 0.15 (0.02–1.27) 0.04 118/24 0.377
No (n = 58) 57.5 (3.8) 0.10 (0.02–1.22) 50/8
Hypercholesterolemia treatment
Yes (n = 119) 70.0 (3.8) 0.04 0.15 (0.02–1.27) 0.05 100/18 0.438
No (n = 81) 59.1 (3.1) 0.11 (0.02–1.22) 68/14
Diabetic mellitus
Yes (n = 19) 90.9 (10.7) 0.02 0.12 (0.03–1.19) 0.442 12/7 0.017
No (n = 181) 62.8 (2.5) 0.13 (0.02–1.27) 156/25
Metabolic syndrome
Yes (n = 27) 85.2 (9.7) 0.03 0.2 (0.04–1.19) 0.001 24/3 0.001
No (n = 173) 62.4 (2.5) 0.1 (0.02–1.27) 120/53

For categorical: n (% of participants); for continuous: mean (SEM), except for BMI, hsCRP, which are expressed as median (range).

P‐values were derived from t‐test for HA, Kruskal–Wallis test for hsCRP, and chi‐square test for Framingham risk score.