Skip to main content
. 2017 May 22;32(2):e22244. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22244

Table 3.

Analyzing prognostic value of routine hematological parameters and long‐term prognosis

Univariable Multivariable
HR (95%CI) P HR (95%CI) P
Age, per 1 year 1.03 (1.01‐1.05) <.01 1.02 (1.00‐1.04) .03
NIHSS, per 1 score 1.10 (1.05‐1.15) <.01 1.06 (1.01‐1.11) .01
RDW, per 1% 1.31 (1.20‐1.43) <.01 1.17 (1.07‐1.28) <.01
NLR, per 1 1.05 (1.03‐1.07) <.01 1.03 (1.01‐1.05) <.01
Eos, per 1% 0.62 (0.48‐0.79) <.01 0.75 (0.59‐0.95) .02
WBC, per 109/L 1.11 (1.07‐1.15) <.01
Mon, per 1% 0.91 (0.83‐0.99) .04

HR, hazard ratio; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; RDW, red blood cell distribution width; Eos, eosinophil percentage; WBC, white blood cell.

Forward conditional Cox model was used and the variables included in model including age, gender, WBC, eosinophil, monocyte, RDW, NIHSS, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease. Age, gender, WBC, eosinophil, monocyte, RDW and NIHSS were expressed as continuous variable, and hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and coronary artery disease were expressed as categorical variable.