Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 6;32(7):e22446. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22446

Table 3.

Risk of CAD according to +45T>G and +276 G>T polymorphisms in cases and controls

Unadjusted Adjusted
Genotype OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
+276 G>T (rs1501299)
Additive model GG vs GT,TT GG vs GT 0.9 (0.53‐1.51) .90 1.04 (0.37‐2.88) .90
GG vs TT 1.1 (0.66‐1.86) .69 0.96 (0.34‐2.66) .93
Dominant model (GG vs GT+TT) GG vs GT + TT 1.01 (0.72‐1.41) .94 0.47 (0.22‐0.97) .04
Recessive model (GG+GT vs TT) GG + GT vs TT 1.09 (0.68‐1.74) .7 0.64 (0.25‐1.60) .34
+45 T>G (rs2241766)
Additive model (TTvs TG, GG) TT vs TG 1.22 (0.60‐2.49) .57 2.21 (0.48‐10.16) .30
TT vs GG 0.81 (0.40‐1.66) .72 1.38 (0.33‐5.76) .3
Dominant TT vs TG+GG TT vs TG + GG 0.9 (0.63‐1.28) .56 2.59 (1.17‐5.70) .01
Recessive TT+TG vs GG TT+TG vs GG 0.78 (0.40‐1.50) .46 0.96 (0.24‐3.89) .96

Unadjusted univariate logistic regression analysis.

Adjusted multivariate logistic regression analysis after adjustment for confounders.

Confounders used for this analysis: hypertension, diabetes, age, sex, smoking, BMI, triglyceride, and cholesterol.