Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 26;31(6):e22121. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22121

Table 1.

Comparison between avidity indices determined by ELISA using a multiple diluted serum with a single concentration of a chaotrope calculated according formula of Perciani et al. 21 (area 6 mol/L or area 8 mol/L) and our modified method included only serum dilution 1:50 and 1:100 (area 6 mol/L modified or area 8 mol/L modified)

Comparison urea as chaotrope n r P Comparison NaCl as chaotrope n r P
Area 6 mol/L vs area 8 mol/L 18 .95 <.0001 Area 1 mol/L vs area 2 mol/L 20 .93 <.0001
Area 6 mol/L vs area 6 mol/L modified 18 .96 <.0001 Area 1 mol/L vs area 1 mol/L modified 20 .92 <.0001
Area 8 mol/L vs area 8 mol/L modified 18 .98 <.0001 Area 2 mol/L vs area 2 mol/L modified 20 .92 <.0001
Area 6 mol/L modified vs area 8 mol/L modified 24 .95 <.0001 Area 1 mol/L modified vs area 2 mol/L modified 20 .89 <.0001

n, number of samples; r, Pearson's correlation coefficient; P, level of significance; vs, versus.