Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 6;32(4):e22334. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22334

Table 5.

Analytical sensitivity against HBV subtypes “ad” and “ay”

Subtype panel (PHA807) Lumipulse HBsAg‐HQ Architect HBsAg QT HISCL HBsAg Lumipulse HBsAg ADVIA Centaur HBsAg II
PHA‐01 ad (3.1 ng/mL) + + + + +
PHA‐02 ad (1.5 ng/mL) + + + + +
PHA‐03 ad (1.0 ng/mL) + + + + +
PHA‐04 ad (0.9 ng/mL) + + + + +
PHA‐05 ad (0.7 ng/mL) + + + + +
PHA‐06 ad (0.5 ng/mL) + + + + +
PHA‐07 ad (0.4 ng/mL) + + + + +
PHA‐08 ad (0.3 ng/mL) + + + + +
PHA‐09 ad (0.2 ng/mL) + + + +
PHA‐10 ad (0.1 ng/mL) +
PHA‐10 × 2 dil. (0.05 ng/mL) +
PHA‐10 × 4 dil. (0.025 ng/mL) +
PHA‐11 ay (2.6 ng/mL) + + + + +
PHA‐12 ay (1.3 ng/mL) + + + + +
PHA‐13 ay (0.9 ng/mL) + + + + +
PHA‐14 ay (0.8 ng/mL) + + + + +
PHA‐15 ay (0.6 ng/mL) + + + + +
PHA‐16 ay (0.5 ng/mL) + + + + +
PHA‐17 ay (0.4 ng/mL) + + + + +
PHA‐18 ay (0.3 ng/mL) + + + +
PHA‐19 ay (0.2 ng/mL) + + + +
PHA‐20 ay (0.1 ng/mL) +
PHA‐20 × 2 dil. (0.05 ng/mL) +
PHA‐20 × 4 dil. (0.025 ng/mL) +

The sample judged as positive was described as +, and the specimen judged as negative was done as –.