Table 2.
Detection | Mtb | Non‐Mtb | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SCM | + | 88a | 0 | — |
− | 12a | 22 | — | |
RT‐LAMP | + | 100 | 0 | <0.01b |
− | 0 | 22 | — | |
LAMP | + | 92 | 0 | >0.05c |
− | 8 | 22 | <0.05d |
Mtb patients, n = 100; non‐Mtb patients, n = 22;
The sensitivity of RT‐LAMP compared to SCM;
The sensitivity of LAMP compared to SCM;
The sensitivity of RT‐LAMP compared to LAMP.