Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 16;55(10):2162–2176. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2018.1493194

Table 2.

Logistic regressions with aid as share of federal spending treatment and controls

  Not enough aid Too much aid
Treated 1.16 0.98
  (0.53) (0.88)
Male 0.66* 0.95
  (0.08) (0.74)
Over 35 1.95** 2.04***
  (0.02) (0.00)
Urban 1.02 0.89
  (0.93) (0.50)
Income (ln) 0.99 0.90
  (0.95) (0.39)
Academic Education 3.20*** 0.52***
  (0.00) (0.00)
Party    
 Labor 3.31*** 0.91
  (0.00) (0.60)
 Greens 17.74*** 0.29***
  (0.00) (0.00)
 Other 2.20* 1.53
  (0.08) (0.12)
 Don’t Know 2.34* 0.56**
  (0.06) (0.03)
Constant 0.02*** 0.99
  (0.00) (0.98)
n 815 815

Notes: Odds ratios and p-values shown; regressions run with survey weights and robust SEs. *p < 0.1, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01; in all regressions the omitted party is the (centre-right) Coalition; academic education is a binary variable, coded one if the respondent has completed a degree from an academic tertiary institution (vocational tertiary education along with having no tertiary education is coded as zero).