Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 22;7:687. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00687

Table 5.

Scope of the reaction with different pyrroles 2a–d and aldehydes 10a–j.

graphic file with name fchem-07-00687-i0005.jpg
Entrya Capsule 2 10 Yield(%)b % (11)c % (12)c
1 No 2b 10a
Yes 70 70 (11ba)e
2 No 2c 10a
Yes
3 No 2d 10a
Yes
4 No 2a 10b
Yes 99 90 (11ab) 9 (12ab)
5 No 2a 10c
Yes 98 96 (11ac) 2 (12ac)d
6 No 2a 10d
Yes 98 88 (11ad) 10 (12ad)
7 No 2a 10e
Yes 95 93 (11ae) 2 (11ae)d
8f No 2a 10f
Yes 98 96 (11af) 2 (12af)d
9f No 2a 10g
Yes 98 96 (11ag) 2 (12ag)d
10 No 2a 10h
Yes 97 95 (11ah) 2 (12ah)d
11 No 2a 10i 6 (12ai)
Yes 97 91 (11ai)
12 No 2a 10j
Yes 85 76 (11aj)d 9 (12aj)d
a

Reactions were performed on a 0.16 mmol scale using 2a–d (4 equiv.), 10a–j (1 equiv.), and capsule C (0.26 equiv.) in water saturated CDCl3 (1.1 mL) under stirring for 16 h at 50°C.

b

Overall yield of all the isolated products.

c

Yields of the isolated products by chromatography on column.

d

The column gave an inseparable mixture with the regioisomer and the yield was calculated by integration of the respective 1H-NMR signals of the regioisomers in the isolated fraction.

e

1H NMR spectrum on crude reaction mixture showed presence of other species obtained after chromathography purification as a complex and inseparable fraction not characterized.

f

These reactions were performed under stirring for 48 h at 50°C.