Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 9;5(4):217–226. doi: 10.1002/cjp2.135

Table 2.

Results of the multivariable Cox models for OS and DFS used to derive the nomograms

HR 95% CI P value
OS model
Ki‐67* <0.001
70.0% versus 1.8% 11.32 (5.28–24.24)
Morphology <0.001
POD versus WED 4.83 (2.30–10.15)
DFS model
Morphology <0.001
POD versus WED with MoTIFs PI = 0 10.23 (5.67–18.47)
POD versus WED with MoTIFs PI = 5 2.87 (1.21–6.81)
MoTIF PI <0.001
5 versus 0 with morphology WED 6.21 (2.52–13.31)
5 versus 0 with morphology POD 1.74 (0.70–4.30)
*

Fitted through 3‐knots restricted cubic spline; the two values are, respectively, the third and first quartile of Ki‐67 distribution.

Wald test P value of the main effect and interaction between morphology and MoTIF PI.