Table 2.
HR | 95% CI | P value | |
---|---|---|---|
OS model | |||
Ki‐67* | <0.001 | ||
70.0% versus 1.8% | 11.32 | (5.28–24.24) | |
Morphology | <0.001 | ||
POD versus WED | 4.83 | (2.30–10.15) | |
DFS model | |||
Morphology | <0.001† | ||
POD versus WED with MoTIFs PI = 0 | 10.23 | (5.67–18.47) | |
POD versus WED with MoTIFs PI = 5 | 2.87 | (1.21–6.81) | |
MoTIF PI | <0.001† | ||
5 versus 0 with morphology WED | 6.21 | (2.52–13.31) | |
5 versus 0 with morphology POD | 1.74 | (0.70–4.30) |
Fitted through 3‐knots restricted cubic spline; the two values are, respectively, the third and first quartile of Ki‐67 distribution.
Wald test P value of the main effect and interaction between morphology and MoTIF PI.