Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 16;2019:7294582. doi: 10.1155/2019/7294582

Table 3.

Performance comparison based on Wbcd and Bcwo datasets.

Dataset Method Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity G-mean AUC MCC
Wbcd K + boosted C5.0 0.982 0.9375 1 0.9682 0.969 0.956
SMOTEBoost 0.964 0.946 0.978 0.9619 0.963 0.924
RUSBoost 0.944 0.93 0.954 0.942 0.942 0.886
SMOTE-Boosted C5.O 0.925 0.939 0.911 0.9248 0.925 0.847

Bcwo K + boosted C5.0 0.975 0.991 0.969 0.9799 0.980 0.936
SMOTEBoost 0.92 0.98 0.89 0.934 0.933 0.839
RUSBoost 0.936 0.926 0.944 0.9350 0.934 0.8539
SMOTE-Boosted C5.0 0.937 0.934 0.941 0.9375 0.937 0.8756