Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 4;8(20):e011972. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.011972

Table 1.

De Novo VHD CPMs Overview

Author, Model Name Publication, y Valve Standardized Type of Intervention Outcome Model Method C‐Statistic Calibration Measure Externally Validated?
Isolated valve
Edwards,16 STS (original) Isolated Valve 2001 Aortic/Mitral Surgery 30 d operative mortality Logistic regression 0.766 HL statistic, Calibration plot Yes
Nowicki,17 NNE Aortic and Mitral Models 2004 Aortic Surgery In‐hospital mortality Logistic regression, score 0.75 HL statistic Yes
Mitral Surgery In‐hospital mortality Logistic regression, score 0.79 HL statistic Yes
Kuduvalli,18 NWQIP 2007 Aortic Surgery In‐hospital mortality Logistic regression, score 0.78 HL statistic Yes
Cruz‐Gonzalez,19 PMV Score 2009 Mitral Percutaneous Procedural success Logistic regression, score NR HL statistic Yes
Monin20 2009 Aortic stenosis Natural History Composite (Non‐MACE) Logistic regression, score 0.90 HL statistic Yes
O'Brien,9 STS (2009)—Composite AEs 2009 Aortic/Mitral Surgery Composite (Non‐MACE) Logistic regression 0.721 None Yes
O'Brien,9 STS (2009)—DSWI 2009 Aortic/Mitral Surgery DSWI Logistic regression 0.704 None Yes
O'Brien,9 STS (2009)—Mortality 2009 Aortic/Mitral Surgery 30 d mortality Logistic regression 0.805 None Yes
O'Brien,9 STS (2009)—Prolonged LOS 2009 Aortic/Mitral Surgery Prolonged LOS Logistic regression 0.77 None Yes
O'Brien,9 STS (2009)—Prolonged Ventilation 2009 Aortic/Mitral Surgery Prolonged ventilation Logistic regression 0.77 None Yes
O'Brien,9 STS (2009)—Renal Failure 2009 Aortic/Mitral Surgery Renal failure Logistic regression 0.782 None Yes
O'Brien,9 STS (2009)—Reoperation 2009 Aortic/Mitral Surgery Reoperation Logistic regression 0.643 None Yes
O'Brien,9 STS (2009)—Short LOS 2009 Aortic/Mitral Surgery Prolonged LOS Logistic regression 0.738 None No
O'Brien,9 STS (2009)—Stroke 2009 Aortic/Mitral Surgery Stroke Logistic regression 0.694 None Yes
Guaragna,21 GuaragnaSCORE 2010 Aortic/Mitral Surgery In‐hospital mortality Logistic regression, score 0.82 HL statistic, Calibration plot Yes
Guo22 2010 Aortic Surgery In‐hospital mortality Logistic regression NR HL statistic No
Mitral Surgery In‐hospital mortality Logistic regression NR HL statistic No
Elmariah,23 CRRAC the AV Score 2011 Aortic Percutaneous 30 d mortality Cox regression, score 0.754 HL statistic No
Bouleti24 2012 Mitral Percutaneous Composite (MACE) Cox regression, score 0.74 Calibration plot No
Cioffi25 2012 Aortic stenosis Natural History Composite (MACE) Cox regression, score NR None No
Holme,26 SEAS Score 2012 Aortic stenosis Natural History 5 y mortality Cox regression 0.722 HL statistic, Calibration plot, Brier score No
Kötting,27 German Aortic Valve Score 2013 Aortic Percutaneous In‐Hospital Mortality Logistic regression, score 0.808 HL statistic Yes
Arnold,28 6 mo and 1 y Models 2014 Aortic stenosis Percutaneous Composite (Non‐MACE) Logistic regression 0.66 HL statistics, Calibration plot Yes
Aortic stenosis Percutaneous Composite (Non‐MACE) Logistic regression 0.66 HL statistics, Calibration plot Yes
Capodanno,29  OBSERVANT Score 2014 Aortic stenosis Percutaneous 30 d mortality Logistic regression, score 0.73 HL statistic, Calibration plot, Brier score Yes
D'Ascenzo,30 Survival Post‐TAVI (STT)—30 d and 1 y Models 2014 Aortic Percutaneous 30 d mortality Logistic regression, score 0.66 HL statistic Yes
Aortic Percutaneous 1 y mortality Logistic regression, score 0.68 HL statistic Yes
Iung31 2014 Aortic Percutaneous 30 d mortality Logistic regression, score 0.67 HL statistic, Calibration in the large, Calibration plot No
Debonnaire,32 TAVI2‐SCORe 2015 Aortic Percutaneous 1 y mortality Cox regression, score 0.715 HL statistic, Calibration in the large Yes
Edwards7 2016 Aortic Percutaneous In‐hospital mortality Logistic regression 0.67 HL statistics, Calibration in the large, Calibration plot Yes
Isolated or multiple valve
Koplan33 2003 All Surgery Pacemaker placement Logistic regression, score NR None No
Ambler34 2005 Aortic, mitral Surgery In‐hospital mortality Logistic regression, Score 0.77 HL statistic, Calibration plot Yes
Xu35 2006 All Surgery Prolonged LOS Logistic regression 0.81 Calibration in table form No
Hannan36 2007 Aortic, mitral Surgery In‐hospital mortality Logistic regression, Score 0.794 HL statistic, Calibration plot Yes
Xu,37 Fuwai Score 2007 All Surgery Prolonged LOS Logistic regression, Score 0.76 HL statistic, Calibration plot Yes
Shi38 2010 Aortic, mitral Surgery In‐hospital mortality Logistic regression 0.7358 None No
Ariyaratne,39 Aus‐AVR Score 2011 Aortic, mitral Surgery 30 d mortality Logistic regression, Score 0.78 HL statistic, Calibration in the large Yes
Nashef,10 EuroSCORE II 2012 All Surgery In‐hospital mortality Logistic regression 0.8095 None Yes
Hannan,40 NY Operative Mortality Risk Score 2013 Aortic, mitral Surgery 30 d mortality Logistic regression, Score 0.781 HL statistic Yes
Wang41 2013 All Surgery Prolonged ventilation Logistic regression 0.789 HL statistic No
Zheng42 2013 Aortic, mitral Surgery In‐hospital mortality Logistic regression, Score 0.76 HL statistic, Chi‐square statistic, Calibration plot No
Multiple valve
Guo22 2010 Aortic, mitral Surgery In‐hospital mortality Logistic regression NR HL statistic No
Rankin,43 AM Preop 2013 Aortic, mitral Surgery 30 d mortality Logistic regression NR Calibration plot Yes
Rankin,43 MT Preop 2013 mitral, tricuspid Surgery 30 d mortality Logistic regression NR Calibration plot Yes
Rankin,43 AMT Preop 2013 Aortic, mitral, tricuspid Surgery 30 d mortality Logistic regression NR Calibration plot Yes
Rankin,43 AM Preop + Intraop 2013 Aortic, mitral Surgery 30 d mortality Logistic regression NR Calibration plot Yes
Rankin,43 MT Preop + Intraop 2013 Mitral, tricuspid Surgery 30 d mortality Logistic regression NR Calibration plot Yes
Rankin,43 AMT Preop + Intraop 2013 Aortic, mitral, tricuspid Surgery 30 d mortality Logistic regression NR Calibration plot Yes

AEs indicates adverse events; AM, aortic, mitral ; AMT, aortic, mitral, tricuspid; AV, aortic valvuloplasty; Aus‐AVR, Australian aortic valve replacement; CRRAC, critical status, renal dysfunction, right atrial pressure, and cardiac output; DSWI, deep sternal wound infections; EuroSCORE, European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation; HL, Hosmer‐Lemeshow; LOS, length of stay; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; MT, mitral, tricuspid; NNE, Northern New England; NR, not reported; NWQIP, North West Quality Improvement Programme in Cardiac Interventions; NY, New York; OBSERVANT, Observational Study of Appropriateness, Efficacy and Effectiveness of AVR‐TAVR Procedures for the Treatment of Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis; PMV, percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty; SEAS, Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis; STS, Society of Thoracic Surgeons; STT, Survival posT‐TAVI; TAVI, transcatheter aortic valve implantation; TAVR, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.