Table 10.
Simple sequence repeat primer | Allelic distribution patterns of the Starmaya F1hybrid | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6 | P7 | P8 | P9 | P10 | |
Sat 11 | A1A2 | A1A2 | A1A2 | A1A2 | A1A2 | A1A2 | A1A2 | A1A2 | A1A2 | A1A2 |
Sat 225 | B1B2B3 | B1B2B3 | B1B2B3 | B1B2B3 | B1B2B3 | B1B2b3 | B1B2B3 | B1B2B3 | B1B2B3 | B1B2B3 |
Sat 24 | C2C3C4* | C1C3 | C1C3 | C1C3 | C1C3 | C1C3 | C1C3 | C1C3 | C1C2C3 | C1C3 |
Sat 32 | D1D3D5** | D1D2D3 | D1D2D3 | D1D2D4 | D1D2D3 | D1D2D3 | D1D2D3 | D1D2D3 | D1D2D4 | D1D2D3 |
Sat 47 | E1E2E3 | E1E2E3 | E1E2E3 | E1E2E3 | E1E2E3 | E1E2E3 | E1E2E3 | E1E2E3 | E1E2E3 | E1E2E3 |
Sat 235 | F1F2 | F1F2 | F1F2 | F1F2 | F1F2 | F1F2 | F1F2 | F1F2 | F1F2 | F1F2 |
Sat 254 | G1G2 | G1G2 | G1G2 | G1G2 | G1G2 | G1G2 | G1G2 | G1G2 | G1G2 | G1G2 |
Sat 29 | H1H2H3 | H1H2H3 | H1H2H3 | H1H2H3 | H1H2H3 | H1H2H3 | H1H2H3 | H1H2H3 | H1H2H3 | H1H2H3 |
Sat 244 | I1I2I3 | I1I2I3 | I1I2I3 | I1I2I3 | I1I2I3 | I1I2I3 | I1I2I3 | I1I2I3 | I1I2I3 | I1I2I3 |
Sat 207 | J1J2J3 | J1J2J3 | J1J2J3 | J1J2J3 | J1J2J3 | J1J2J3 | J1J2J3 | J1J2J3 | J1J23 | J1J2J3 |
*C4 allele with a fragment length of 163 bp. **C5 allele with a fragment length of 111 bp.
The simple sequence repeat markers correspond to those described in Table 2 . The results obtained for the 10 plants of F1 hybrid Starmaya were compared with those previously obtained for the two parents (Marsellesa® and Sterile Male CIR-SM01) and described in Table 9 . The black codes identified in P1 plant indicate a pollen contamination. The gray codes identified in plants P8 and P9 indicate the presence of heterozygous alleles in the CIR-SM01 parent.