Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2019 Aug 1;202:116064. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116064

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

ROI analysis of the five different methods. The susceptibility values of the ROIs (CN, PUT, GP, SN, RN, IC, CC, OR) are plotted, the autoQSM’s results match well with the gold-standard COSMOS QSM results. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. No statistically significantly difference was found in the eight ROIs within the group of subjects.