Table 1.
Demographic and histopathological characteristics of the 23 participants used for miRNA microarray evaluation
| No. | Sex | Age | Histopathological diagnosis | Histopatological stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 81 | high grade urothelial carcinoma | pT2 |
| 2 | M | 71 | low grade urothelial carcinoma | pTa |
| 3 | M | 61 | high grade urothelial carcinoma | pT1 |
| 4 | F | 53 | low grade urothelial carcinoma | PTa |
| 5 | F | 50 | low grade urothelial carcinoma | pTa |
| 6 | M | 78 | low grade urothelial carcinoma | pTa |
| 7 | F | 54 | high grade urothelial carcinoma | pT2 |
| 8 | M | 45 | high grade urothelial carcinoma | pT4 |
| 9 | M | 67 | low grade urothelial carcinoma | pT1 |
| 10 | F | 63 | high grade urothelial carcinoma | pT2 |
| 11 | M | 43 | low grade urothelial carcinoma | pTa |
| 12 | M | 60 | low grade urothelial carcinoma | pTa |
| 13 | M | 75 | low grade urothelial carcinoma | pTa |
| 14 | M | 75 | low grade urothelial carcinoma | PTis |
| 15 | M | 61 | high grade urothelial carcinoma | pT4 |
| 16 | M | 93 | high grade urothelial carcinoma | pT3a |
| 17 | M | 65 | high grade urothelial carcinoma | pT2 |
| 18 | M | 58 | high grade urothelial carcinoma | pT2 |
| 19 | M | 57 | high grade urothelial carcinoma | pTa |
| 20 | F | 64 | low grade urothelial carcinoma | pTa |
| 21 | M | 61 | low grade urothelial carcinoma | pT1 |
| 22 | M | 70 | high grade urothelial carcinoma | pT2 |
| 23 | M | 68 | high grade urothelial carcinoma | pT2 |