Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 28;19:1390. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7748-3

Table 3.

Crude and adjusted models for independent variables with ever shisha smoking

Crude Model Adjusted Model
OR CI 95% P value OR CI 95% P value
City < 0.001 0.048
 Khartoum 1.17 (0.85–1.60) 1.10 (0.77–1.57)
 Omdurman Ref Ref
 Bahri 1.83 (1.34–2.49) 1.51 (1.09–2.10)
Gender < 0.001 0.754
 Male 1.75 (1.33–2.30) 1.06 (0.75–1.49)
 Female Ref Ref
Grade < 0.001 0.179
 1st 0.74 (0.53–1.04) 1.0 (0.68–1.48)
 2nd Ref Ref
 3rd 1.53 (1.13–2.08) 1.33 (0.92–1.91)
Daily allowance < 0.013 0.744
Academic performance < 0.001 < 0.002
 Excellent 1.50 (1.05–2.16) 1.23 (0.82–1.84)
 Very Good 0.78 (0.58–1.07) 0.72 (0.50–1.02)
 Good Ref Ref
 Fair 0.78 (0.42–1.42) 0.60 (0.31–1.17)
 Poor 5.06 (1.97–13.0) 2.90 (1.21–6.94)
Family structure < 0.016 0.147
 Father only 2.23 (1.14–4.37) 1.99 (0.96–4.16)
 Mother only 1.5 (1.04–2.17) 1.22 (0.81–1.84)
 Father and mother Ref Ref
 Others 1.43 (0.93–2.22) 1.41 (0.87–2.29)
Parents smoking 0.322
Friends smoking cigarettes < 0.001 < 0.01
 Yes 2.20 (1.58–3.07) 2.76 (1.90–4.01)
 No Ref Ref
Restriction of selling shisha to minors < 0.002 < 0.010
 I did not try to buy shisha 1.36 (0.99–1.87) 1.43 (1.03–1.99)
 Yes 2.49 (1.48–4.20) 2.21 (1.28–3.82)
 No Ref Ref
Peer pressure to smoke Shisha < 0.001 < 0.01
 Yes 11.46 (6.84–19.32) 13.76 (7.86–24.07)
 No Ref Ref
Friends smoking shisha < 0.001 < 0.01
 Yes 2.24 (1.58–3.17) 2.39 (1.65–3.45)
 No Ref Ref