Table 3.
Crude and adjusted models for independent variables with ever shisha smoking
| Crude Model | Adjusted Model | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR CI 95% | P value | OR CI 95% | P value | |
| City | < 0.001 | 0.048 | ||
| Khartoum | 1.17 (0.85–1.60) | 1.10 (0.77–1.57) | ||
| Omdurman | Ref | Ref | ||
| Bahri | 1.83 (1.34–2.49) | 1.51 (1.09–2.10) | ||
| Gender | < 0.001 | 0.754 | ||
| Male | 1.75 (1.33–2.30) | 1.06 (0.75–1.49) | ||
| Female | Ref | Ref | ||
| Grade | < 0.001 | 0.179 | ||
| 1st | 0.74 (0.53–1.04) | 1.0 (0.68–1.48) | ||
| 2nd | Ref | Ref | ||
| 3rd | 1.53 (1.13–2.08) | 1.33 (0.92–1.91) | ||
| Daily allowance | – | < 0.013 | – | 0.744 |
| Academic performance | < 0.001 | < 0.002 | ||
| Excellent | 1.50 (1.05–2.16) | 1.23 (0.82–1.84) | ||
| Very Good | 0.78 (0.58–1.07) | 0.72 (0.50–1.02) | ||
| Good | Ref | Ref | ||
| Fair | 0.78 (0.42–1.42) | 0.60 (0.31–1.17) | ||
| Poor | 5.06 (1.97–13.0) | 2.90 (1.21–6.94) | ||
| Family structure | < 0.016 | 0.147 | ||
| Father only | 2.23 (1.14–4.37) | 1.99 (0.96–4.16) | ||
| Mother only | 1.5 (1.04–2.17) | 1.22 (0.81–1.84) | ||
| Father and mother | Ref | Ref | ||
| Others | 1.43 (0.93–2.22) | 1.41 (0.87–2.29) | ||
| Parents smoking | – | 0.322 | – | – |
| Friends smoking cigarettes | < 0.001 | < 0.01 | ||
| Yes | 2.20 (1.58–3.07) | 2.76 (1.90–4.01) | ||
| No | Ref | Ref | ||
| Restriction of selling shisha to minors | < 0.002 | < 0.010 | ||
| I did not try to buy shisha | 1.36 (0.99–1.87) | 1.43 (1.03–1.99) | ||
| Yes | 2.49 (1.48–4.20) | 2.21 (1.28–3.82) | ||
| No | Ref | Ref | ||
| Peer pressure to smoke Shisha | < 0.001 | < 0.01 | ||
| Yes | 11.46 (6.84–19.32) | 13.76 (7.86–24.07) | ||
| No | Ref | Ref | ||
| Friends smoking shisha | < 0.001 | < 0.01 | ||
| Yes | 2.24 (1.58–3.17) | 2.39 (1.65–3.45) | ||
| No | Ref | Ref | ||