Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 22;5(10):e02617. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02617

Table 2.

Communities’ perception of impact of galamsey activities on resources and ecosystem services.

Ecosystem services/land issues Communities
P-value
Ntakam
Asawinso 1
Nkatieso
1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
Water availability 33.33 14.58 52.08 46.94 6.12 46.94 27.78 7.41 64.81 0.162
Water quality 25 4.17 70.83 29.17 2.08 68.75 27.78 5.56 66.67 0.911
Land availability for farming 20.83 22.92 56.25 24.49 10.2 65.31 20.75 13.21 66.04 0.483
Land accessibility 20.83 22.92 56.25 20.83 14.58 64.58 26.42 13.21 60.38 0.67
Land productivity (fertility) 21.28 17.02 61.7 30.61 12.24 57.14 23.4 14.89 61.7 0.844
Flooding leading to destruction of farms 14.89 21.28 63.83 6.38 21.28 72.34 6.52 19.57 73.91 0.586

Scale of assessment: 3-point Likert scale (1 = low impact; 2 = moderate impact 3 = high impact).