Table 2.
Ecosystem services/land issues | Communities |
P-value | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ntakam |
Asawinso 1 |
Nkatieso |
||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
Water availability | 33.33 | 14.58 | 52.08 | 46.94 | 6.12 | 46.94 | 27.78 | 7.41 | 64.81 | 0.162 |
Water quality | 25 | 4.17 | 70.83 | 29.17 | 2.08 | 68.75 | 27.78 | 5.56 | 66.67 | 0.911 |
Land availability for farming | 20.83 | 22.92 | 56.25 | 24.49 | 10.2 | 65.31 | 20.75 | 13.21 | 66.04 | 0.483 |
Land accessibility | 20.83 | 22.92 | 56.25 | 20.83 | 14.58 | 64.58 | 26.42 | 13.21 | 60.38 | 0.67 |
Land productivity (fertility) | 21.28 | 17.02 | 61.7 | 30.61 | 12.24 | 57.14 | 23.4 | 14.89 | 61.7 | 0.844 |
Flooding leading to destruction of farms | 14.89 | 21.28 | 63.83 | 6.38 | 21.28 | 72.34 | 6.52 | 19.57 | 73.91 | 0.586 |
Scale of assessment: 3-point Likert scale (1 = low impact; 2 = moderate impact 3 = high impact).