Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 30;39(44):8778–8787. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0888-19.2019

Table 4.

Nonreplication of each of the main findings from Pinel et al. (2012) in multiple independent samples and in a combined analysis using F tests to assess genotype associations with ROI activations

GENESNP Pinel et al. (2012) effects Subsample p-value F-test value
FOXP2rs6980093 AA > AG > GG MOUS visual 0.16 F(1,106) = 1.85
Left inferior frontal gyrus activation MOUS auditory 0.36 F(1,107) = 1.05
Visual and auditory EvLab visual 0.66 F(1,201) = 0.41
Combined 0.20 F(2,416) = 1.60
FOXP2rs7784315 TC > TT MOUS visual 0.85 F(1,104) = 0.37
Left precentral gyrus activation EvLab visual 0.91 F(1,198) = 0.01
Visual only Combined 0.97 F(1,304) = 0.00
KIAA0319rs17243157 CC > TC MOUS visual 0.56 F(1,105) = 0.34
Superior temporal sulcus functional asymmetry MOUS auditory 0.21 F(1,107) = 1.58
Visual and auditory EvLab visual 0.48 F(1,197) = 0.50
Combined 0.30 F(1,411) = 1.07

For rs6980093, we tested the three allelic groups, whereas for rs7784315 and rs17243157, we compared major allele homozygotes with heterozygotes, as the homozygous minor allele groups were too small for a meaningful comparison (see main text).