Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 21;84(6):1257–1267. doi: 10.1007/s00280-019-03954-8

Table 1.

Summary statistics for atezolizumab exposure simulated for various regimens

Regimen Cmax (90% PI), μg/mL Cmin (90% PI), μg/mL Weekly AUC (90% PI), μg·day/mLa
1200 mg q3w
 Cycle 1 403 (274–581) 85 (55–133) 1048 (763–1471)
 Steady state 610 (414–891) 194 (89–383) 2115 (1264–3507)
840 mg q2w
 Cycle 1 281 (187–420) 74 (48–116) 860 (617–1237)
 Steady state 517 (334–801) 226 (118–426) 2188 (1336–3733)
1680 mg q4w
 Cycle 1 563 (379–822) 97 (58–159) 1288 (887–1845)
 Steady state 759 (514–1106) 182 (87–369) 2217 (1357–3705)
20 mg/kg q3w
 Cycle 1 501 (378–665) 107 (70–149) 1305 (1002–1683)
 Steady state 753 (544–1038) 238 (115–443) 2596 (1592–4140)

Geometric means with 90% PIs (for 500 patients) are shown

AUC area under the concentration–time curve, Cmax maximum serum atezolizumab concentration, Cmin minimum (trough) serum atezolizumab concentration, PI prediction interval, q2w every 2 weeks, q3w every 3 weeks, q4w every 4 weeks

aWeekly AUC over 3 weeks (for q3w regimens), over 4 weeks (for q4w regimen), and over 2 weeks (for q2w regimen)