Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019 Dec 1;82(4):386–391. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002148

Table 1:

Effect of adherence interruptions on inflammatory biomarkers. Both sets of models adjust for potential confounders (baseline inflammation level, use of a nevirapine versus efavirenz-based regimen, duration of viral suppression, age, gender, baseline log viral load, depression, and heavy alcohol use); the second model also adjusts for average adherence.

Effect of treatment interruption on
biomarkers of inflammation
Biomarker Without adjustment for average
adherence
With adjustment for average
adherence
Effect (95% CI) P Effect (95% CI) P
sCD14 2.6 (0.7, 4.6) 0.008 4.4 (0.9, 8.0) 0.014
sCD163 4.6 (1.7, 7.6) 0.002 9.8 (5.0, 14.9) <0.001
D-dimer 10.1 (2.6, 18.0) 0.007 2.4 (−9.4, 15.8) 0.70
HLA−DR+/CD8+ 2.7 (0.3, 5.1) 0.025 0.7 (−3.2, 4.7) 0.74
IL-6 14.1 (3.5, 25.8) 0.008 5.9 (−8.5, 22.6) 0.44
K/T ratio 4.9 (1.9, 8.1) 0.002 8.3 (2.3, 14.6) 0.006