Table 2.
Model | Study 1 | Study 2 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R 2 | AIC | dAIC | X2 | p | R 2 | AIC | dAIC | X2 | p | |
Model 0 (baseline): VD + Cb-w | 0.22 | 4112 | 0.19 | 4396 | ||||||
Model 1: baseline + OVreward | 0.22 | 4112 | 0 | 2.72 | 0.099 | 0.19 | 4398 | 2 | 0.04 | 0.847 |
Model 2: baseline + Cb-w: OVreward | 0.26 | 3956 | −156 | 157.68 | <0.001 | 0.25 | 4197 | −202 | 203.31 | <.001 |
Model 3: baseline + OVgoal | 0.26 | 3957 | 1 | 2.59 | 0.108 | 0.25 | 4195 | −2 | 0.06 | 0.809 |
For each study, models are compared sequentially, and dAIC is the difference in AIC of each model to the previous model. VD Value Difference, OV overall value, significant effects are highlighted in bold