Table 5.
The performance of COCACOLA, CONCOCT, MaxBin, MetaBAT, BMC3C and SolidBin on the StrainMock dataset
| StrainMock | Recall (%) | Precision (%) | F-score (%) | NMI (%) | ARI (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COCACOLA | 99.20 | 99.26 | 99.23 | 98.63 | 99.03 |
| COCACOLA-coalign | 95.87 | 93.53 | 94.69 | 95.46 | 94.57 |
| MaxBin | 96.35 | 91.00 | 93.60 | 98.36 | 86.69 |
| CONCOCT | 98.21 | 93.85 | 95.98 | 96.24 | 93.99 |
| MetaBAT | 81.24 | 59.87 | 68.94 | 69.76 | 33.50 |
| BMC3C(9401/9417) | 99.01 | 99.01 | 99.01 | 98.42 | 98.73 |
| SolidBin-naive | 98.92 | 98.92 | 98.92 | 98.49 | 98.91 |
| SolidBin-SFS(α*=20) | 99.29 | 99.29 | 99.29 | 98.75 | 99.13 |
| SolidBin-coalign(α*=10) | 99.46 | 92.59 | 95.90 | 95.93 | 87.74 |
| SolidBin-CL(β*=0.1) | 99.29 | 99.29 | 99.29 | 98.74 | 99.12 |
| SolidBin-SFS-CL(α*= 30) | 99.29 | 99.29 | 99.29 | 98.75 | 99.12 |
Note: The optimal values of the results are in bold.