Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 12;35(21):4229–4238. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz253

Table 6.

The performance of COCACOLA, CONCOCT, MaxBin, MetaBAT, BMC3C and SolidBin on the ‘StrainMock’ dataset (evaluated on species level)

StrainMock Recall (%) Precision (%) F-score (%) NMI (%) ARI (%)
COCACOLA 91.81 99.96 95.71 95.90 86.67
COCACOLA-coalign 91.27 99.94 95.41 96.89 88.01
MaxBin 91.01 91.01 91.01 91.87 78.50
CONCOCT 91.11 99.63 95.18 96.82 89.50
MetaBAT 81.24 67.32 73.63 72.46 34.10
BMC3C(9401/9417) 91.58 99.97 95.59 95.94 86.51
SolidBin-naive 91.94 99.99 95.80 96.06 86.89
SolidBin-SFS(α*=20) 92.00 99.99 95.83 96.06 86.92
SolidBin-coalign(α*=10) 99.46 99.97 99.71 99.39 98.83
SolidBin-CL(β*=0.1) 92.01 99.98 95.83 96.05 86.92
SolidBin-SFS-CL(α*=30) 92.00 99.99 95.83 96.06 86.92

Note: The optimal values of the results are in bold.