Table 8.
The performance of COCACOLA, CONCOCT, MaxBin, MetaBAT, BMC3C and SolidBin on the ‘MetaHIT’ (partial) dataset
| MetaHIT_partial | Recall (%) | Precision (%) | F-score (%) | NMI (%) | ARI (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COCACOLA | 91.87 | 83.63 | 87.56 | 84.26 | 76.38 |
| COCACOLA-coalign | 91.92 | 85.39 | 88.54 | 86.04 | 80.91 |
| MaxBin | 84.75 | 73.58 | 78.77 | 77.84 | 69.02 |
| CONCOCT | 80.41 | 90.26 | 85.05 | 85.29 | 74.33 |
| MetaBAT | 74.34 | 52.59 | 61.60 | 61.37 | 30.19 |
| BMC3C(17 122/17 136) | 87.50 | 91.45 | 89.43 | 87.90 | 82.82 |
| SolidBin-naive | 85.85 | 87.15 | 86.49 | 85.76 | 77.30 |
| SolidBin-SFS(α*=10) | 86.24 | 87.22 | 86.73 | 85.91 | 77.95 |
| SolidBin-coalign(α*=40) | 97.01 | 97.18 | 97.10 | 96.01 | 93.49 |
| SolidBin-CL(β*=0.2) | 90.47 | 91.17 | 90.82 | 89.98 | 85.34 |
| SolidBin-SFS-CL(α*=0) | 85.85 | 87.15 | 86.49 | 85.76 | 77.30 |
Note: The optimal values of the results are in bold.