Table 1.
Leaf | Stem | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Sugar, genotype | Nutrient-poor | Nutrient-rich | Nutrient-poor | Nutrient-rich |
Fucose | ||||
Sin-11 | 0.04 ± ≤0.01 | 0.04 ± ≤0.01 | 0.02 ± ≤0.01 | 0.02 ± ≤0.01 |
Sac-5 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± ≤0.01 | 0.01 ± ≤0.01 | 0.01 ± ≤0.01 |
Gig-311 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± ≤0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± ≤0.01 |
Arabinose | ||||
Sin-11 | 4.27 ± 0.23 | 4.12 ± 0.36 | 3.04 ± 0.52 | 2.83 ± 0.33 |
Sac-5 | 3.73 ± 0.25 | 3.47 ± 0.30 | 1.53 ± 0.18 | 1.77 ± 0.13 |
Gig-311 | 3.76 ± 0.23 | 3.92 ± 0.09 | 2.09 ± 0.92 | 1.62 ± 0.14 |
Galactose | ||||
Sin-11 | 1.11 ± 0.06 | 1.04 ± 0.07 | 0.61 ± 0.11 | 0.44 ± 0.06 |
Sac-5 | 0.84 ± 0.07 | 0.79 ± 0.08 | 0.19 ± 0.03 | 0.25 ± 0.05 |
Gig-311 | 0.88 ± 0.07 | 0.93 ± 0.06 | 0.42 ± 0.27 | 0.30 ± 0.05 |
Rhamnose | ||||
Sin-11 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 |
Sac-5 | 0.03 ± ≤0.01 | 0.04 ± ≤0.01 | ≤0.01 ± ≤0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 |
Gig-311 | 0.03 ± ≤0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 0.01 ± 0.01 |
Glucose | ||||
Sin-11 | 7.84 ± 3.62 | 5.56 ± 3.74 | 12.95 ± 6.67 | 4.54 ± 2.29 |
Sac-5 | 5.67 ± 2.74 | 1.86 ± 1.20 | 11.87 ± 2.39 | 2.62 ± 0.92 |
Gig-311 | 3.12 ± 1.39 | 3.12 ± 1.29 | 7.81 ± 4.17 | 7.20 ± 4.14 |
Xylose | ||||
Sin-11 | 15.76 ± 1.94 | 15.52 ± 1.32 | 17.37 ± 1.11 | 18.10 ± 1.47 |
Sac-5 | 16.08 ± 0.68 | 15.76 ± 1.33 | 13.27 ± 1.03 | 15.30 ± 0.58 |
Gig-311 | 15.41 ± 0.74 | 16.08 ± 0.27 | 13.20 ± 1.66 | 12.92 ± 0.83 |
Mannose | ||||
Sin-11 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.05 ± ≤0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.01 |
Sac-5 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± ≤0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 |
Gig-311 | 0.10 ± 0.04 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.03 | 0.03 ± ≤0.01 |
Values are mean ± standard deviation of biological and technical replicates (minimum for each value, n = 4; total samples for each monosaccharide, n = 60).
Leaf and stem samples used for this assay were collected at the end of the experiment from the three miscanthus genotypes grown at 75 % SWC.
Supplementary Data Table S6 shows the ANOVA results for the matrix monosaccharides.