Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Phys Chem B. 2019 Jan 10;123(3):675–688. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b09752

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Graphical representation of the physical model formulating a smFRET experiment. Fluorophores and molecule fnD, fnA, and sn evolve stochastically through time (left to right). Measured photon intensities InD and InA in the donor and acceptor channels are determined by (i) the photoemission rates associated with sn, (ii) the photophysical state of the fluorophores, and (iii) shot noise. FRET efficiency ϵsn depends exclusively on the molecule state sn. By contrast, apparent FRET efficiency ϵn* depends on the measured intensities and, due to photoartifacts, need not coincide with ϵsn. Following common convention, in the schematic, stochastic variables are denoted with circles, deterministic variables are denoted with boxes, measurements are shown shaded, and dependencies among the various variables are indicated by arrows. Dashed lines indicate dependences irrelevant to the generation of the measurements.