Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 9;110(5):1148–1167. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz172

TABLE 3.

Pharmacokinetic parameters derived from the plasma d3- and d6-α-T enrichment percentages following oral d3- and IV d6-α-T administration during 3 interventions1

Parameter DLM fat interventions IV d6-α-T Compared with 0% fat,2P value Oral d3-α-T Compared with 0% fat,3P value Oral d3- compared with IV d6-α-T,4P value Interaction,5P value
Elimination rate, Ke 40% fat 0.023 ± 0.002 0.3062 0.020 ± 0.002 0.7828 0.0601 0.5609
0% fat 0.021 ± 0.002 0.020 ± 0.002 0.4862
0% fat-fast 0.026 ± 0.002 0.0551 0.021 ± 0.002 0.7353 0.0336*
Half-life, h 40% fat 30.9 ± 2.2 0.2264 34.2 ± 2.7 0.6058 0.1564 0.2066
0% fat 34.5 ± 2.2 36.2 ± 2.7 0.4862
0% fat-fast 29.0 ± 2.6 0.0982 40.4 ± 3.3 0.3273 0.0336
%Max (enrichment) 40% fat 23.5% ± 1.1% 0.1816 14.7% ± 0.9% 0.0008* <0.0001* 0.0166*
0% fat 24.9% ± 1.1% 18.1% ± 0.9% <0.0001*
0% fat-fast 25.4% ± 1.3% 0.6238 15.5% ± 1.0% 0.0082* 0.0004*
Tmax,6 h 40% fat 7.8 ± 0.6 0.1057 12.9 ± 1.3 0.9809 0.0306* 0.0003*
0% fat 6.5 ± 0.7 12.9 ± 1.3 0.0005*
0% fat-fast 9.0 ± 0.8 0.0055* 20.0 ± 1.4 <0.0001* <0.0001*
AUC0–72 h,7 % · h 40% fat 1101 ± 46 0.9274 657 ± 39 0.0037* <0.0001* 0.1032
0% fat 1105 ± 47 781 ± 39 0.0001*
0% fat-fast 1121 ± 50 0.6622 693 ± 43 0.0323* <0.0001*
Fractional absorption (0–72 h)8 40% fat 61% ± 3% 0.0120*
0% fat 70% ± 3%
0% fat-fast 62% ± 4% 0.0370*
1

Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters (mean ± SEM) were calculated as described in Methods from data shown in Figure 4A, C from women in the following interventions: 40% fat, n = 10; 0% fat, n = 10; and 0% fat, fasting 12 h, n = 7. Statistical analyses of the PK parameters derived from either d6-α-T or d3-α-T enrichment percentages were performed as described for Table 2. *Statistically significant values. Cmax, maximum concentration; DLM, defined liquid meal; Ke, post-Cmax elimination rate; IV, intravenous; Tmax, time of Cmax. The statistical analysis was carried out to answer the questions in the footnotes shown below.

2

What is the effect of the intervention on the IV d6-α-T dose PK parameter?

3

What is the effect of the intervention on the oral d3-α-T dose PK parameter?

4

Are there differences in the IV compared with oral α-T responses for each PK parameter?

5

Did the response differ between the intervention and the route (IV d6-α-T and oral d3-α-T) for the PK parameter?

6

Tmax is postnadir for the IV dose.

7

AUC0–72 is calculated from the plasma d6-α-T and d3-α-T enrichments from 0 to 72 h.

8

From the dual-isotope method (% absorption = oral AUC0–72/IV AUC0–72 × 100).