TABLE 5.
Lipoprotein | 40% fat | 0% fat | 0% fat-fast | Intervention, P value | Lipoprotein, P value | Interaction, P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
d6-α-T AUC0–8 h (% · h) | ||||||
IV dose | ||||||
TRL2 | 160 ± 13 | 171 ± 8 | 174 ± 13 | 0.7145 | 0.0183* | 0.4964 |
LDL3 | 158 ± 13 | 167 ± 8 | 171 ± 13 | |||
HDL | 154 ± 13 | 162 ± 8 | 169 ± 13 | |||
d3-α-T AUC0–8 h (% · h) | ||||||
Oral dose | ||||||
TRL2 | 82 ± 13 | 62 ± 5 | 34 ± 5 | 0.0022* | <0.0001* | 0.2926 |
LDL3 | 28 ± 13 | 34 ± 5 | 12 ± 5 | |||
HDL | 30 ± 13 | 34 ± 5 | 12 ± 5 |
AUC0–8 h (% · h, mean ± SEM) calculated from the lipoprotein d3- and d6-α-tocopherol enrichment percentages from 0 to 8 h following oral d3- and IV d6-α-tocopherol administration to women consuming different fat levels during the defined liquid meal [40% fat, n = 7 (lipoproteins were not obtained for subjects 1–3); 0% fat, n = 10; 0% fat, fasting 12 h, n = 7]. To determine the α-T disposition into the lipoprotein fractions, a Latin square design with double repeated measures (Kronecker product) in SAS PROC MIXED was used independently for each route (oral compared with IV) of α-T administration. Fixed effects were the intervention (40% fat, 0% fat, 0% fat-fast), the lipoprotein fractions (TRL, LDL, HDL), and their interaction. The variance–covariance structure within subjects was modeled by using a Kronecker product in which the treatment was modeled using a compound symmetry matrix, and the lipoprotein fractions within treatment were modeled using an unstructured variance–covariance matrix. *Statistically significant values. IV, intravenous.
TRL, density <1.006 g/L.
LDL, 1.006 < density > 1.063 g/mL.